Skip to content
Open access

Integrating Biologics with Guided Bone Regeneration to Enhance Hard and Soft Tissue Outcomes in Ridge Preservation

Jul 2026 · American Journal of Medical Science and Innovation · Vol 5, pp. 17-28 · 0 citations · 28 references

TL;DR

It is found that guided bone regeneration combined with biologics can markedly improve hard and soft tissue results of ridge preservation, which strongly supports its clinical application in regenerative dentistry.

Abstract

Tooth extraction led to a high degree of dimensional changes in the alveolar ridge that could jeopardize future implant placement and restorative results. While guided bone regeneration had extensively been used for ridge preservation, its healing predictability and regenerative limitations prompted the incorporation of biologic agents. Thus, the objective of this study was to assess hard and soft tissue outcomes of ridge preservation after clarifying the use of biologics with guided bone regeneration based on current evidence. In particular, the study investigated how biologic integration improves hard tissue generation, soft-tissue repair, postoperative recovery, clinical efficiency, treatment satisfaction and the factors limiting uptake. This study used a quantitative cross-sectional research design, and primary data were collected from in-service dental professionals through structured questionnaire by purposive sampling method. Using Cochran’s formula, sample size was determined. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistical methods, including mean and standard deviation. The results demonstrated that biologic-assisted guided bone regeneration produced significant improvements in several aspects of Osseo integration, including increased bone density, ridge preservation, graft maturation, soft tissues thickness and healing efficiency. Finally led to superior esthetics. Results also demonstrated decreased post-operative complication rates, improved clinical efficiency, and strong treatment satisfaction among participants. Unfortunately, high costs, limited availability of valid and scalable tests, training requirements and regulatory barriers emerged as significant obstacles to adoption. This study found that guided bone regeneration combined with biologics can markedly improve hard and soft tissue results of ridge preservation, which strongly supports its clinical application in regenerative dentistry.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Jan 2026

Optimizing Alveolar Ridge Preservation and GBR: A Systematic Review of Membranes, Grafts, and Soft Tissue Strategies for Personalized Care

Successful alveolar regeneration requires a personalized treatment approach, considering defect morphology and individual patient characteristics, and future research should prioritize larger, long‐term, multicenter studies that include real‐world patient populations to support the development of more predictive and pa...

A. Inchingolo, G. Marinelli, Pietro Lauria et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

COMPARISON OF GUIDED BONE REGENERATION AND SUBEPITHELIAL CONNECTIVE TISSUE GRAFT METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF CERVICAL DEFECTS AROUND DENTAL IMPLANTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Background. The aim of this systematic review was to identify studies on the use of soft-tissue techniques for augmenting peri-implant tissues in cases of horizontal alveolar ridge volume deficiency and for the treatment of peri-implant recessions, and to present and compare their outcomes with those of traditional gui...

O. Astapenko, A. V. Svintsitskyi, S. Yemelianov · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Dentin-Based Graft Materials: Current Approaches And Future Perspectives

Alveolar bone resorption subsequent to tooth extraction constitutes a significant clinical problem, which complicates aesthetic, functional, and prosthetic rehabilitation. Following extraction, the resorption process progresses rapidly, resulting in significant alterations to the dimensions of the alveolar ridge. Howev...

Sukran Acipinar, Ümit Tombul · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

METHODS OF BONE AUGMENTATION IN THE AREA OF PLANNED DENTAL IMPLANTATION

Subject. Modern methods and materials for bone augmentation in the area of planned dental implantation, their clinical efficacy and limitations. Objective. To review published literature on methods of bone augmentation prior to dental implantation that are promising for clinical application. Methodology. A review of...

Begli Mukhametberdiyev, A. Khaliullina, S. Ksembaev et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Bone, Soft Tissue, and Periodontal Regeneration.

The oral cavity presents three distinct regenerative challenges: restoration of alveolar bone volume and stability, augmentation of soft mucogingival tissues, and regeneration of the tooth-supporting periodontium. In each of these clinical contexts, conventional approaches remain limited by the morbidity associated wit...

R. Staples, J. Alayan, R. V. Anegundi et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Modified guided bone regeneration technique of the mandible using a biocomposition and an allogeneic dura mater membrane: clinical cases

Insufficient bone volume requires augmentation of the alveolar ridge to create conditions for implant placement in an optimal position and to select its size considering the anticipated functional load. Of clinical interest is a comprehensive modification of the guided bone regeneration protocol aimed at obtaining suff...

Anzor Shurdumov, D. Trunin · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.