The contribution is a reusable, governance-aware operating model for transitioning from task-level AI assistants to accountable, human-supervised, multi-agent AI workforces suitable for digitally mature Vision 2030 organizations.
Abstract
This paper develops a multi-agent enterprise artificial intelligence (AI) operating model for organizations seeking to move beyond isolated AI assistants toward coordinated AI workforces, positioned within Saudi Vision 2030 and the Kingdom’s national data-and-AI strategy. Using design science research, the study specifies the Saudi Enterprise Multi-Agent AI Operating Model (SEMAI) as a conceptual artifact synthesized from enterprise AI, multi-agent systems, digital transformation, responsible AI, and information systems design science literature. The artifact is demonstrated and formatively evaluated through a structured scenario walkthrough based on a generalized Saudi enterprise context; the study does not claim empirical validation or measured deployment outcomes. SEMAI comprises five layers integrating human roles, AI assistants, collaborative agents, enterprise systems, and governance controls. It is accompanied by design requirements, design principles, an artifact specification, an evaluation rubric, a maturity model with progression criteria, governance and accountability controls, and a vendor-neutral model with a Microsoft-oriented reference implementation. The contribution is a reusable, governance-aware operating model for transitioning from task-level AI assistants to accountable, human-supervised, multi-agent AI workforces suitable for digitally mature Vision 2030 organizations.
The emergence of AI agents is expected to reshape software engineering by moving beyond AI as assistants towards systems capable of planning, executing, and evaluating development tasks with increasing autonomy. This transition is particularly significant for embedded software organizations, where strict requirements f...
V. Kjellberg, Srijita Basu, Si-Min Sun et al.· 0 citations
A validated, practitioner-usable framework for calibrating the degree of AI autonomy granted to decision workflows against the governance capacity of the organization is contributed, and offers implications for management education, internal audit, and enterprise risk functions responsible for overseeing algorithmic de...
P. Amutha, M. Bhuvaneswari· International Journal of Res...· 0 citations
The advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Large Language Models (LLMs), and autonomous agents has transformed the design requirements of modern enterprise platforms. Traditional enterprise architectures often lack the intelligence, adaptability, and autonomous capabilities required for dynamic business environme...
B. B. Sree· International Journal of AI...· 0 citations
This research proposes an AI-native enterprise architecture framework that identifies essential design principles and reusable architectural patterns for next-generation intelligent systems and evaluates AI-native design patterns, including intelligent agents, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), AI orchestration, and...
Rohit Kumar· International Journal of AI...· 0 citations
This workshop aims to bring together researchers and practitioners to examine how enterprise AI agents can successfully move from prototypes to production, and focuses on three pillars: 1) Agent architectures and systems; 2) Enterprise applications and deployments; 3) Evaluation and governance.
Min Du, Anbang Xu, Jasmine Jaksic et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
It is argued that agentic AI governance is four problems, not one, each with a mature governing science, and a five-level maturity model with a non-compensatory bottleneck-weighted index and assessment instrument operationalizes CASE as a scientific rather than process maturity model, grounded in production enterprise...
Srinivas Telukunta, Georgios Nektarios Lilis, Lucio Baron· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.