A transparent model of Cultural Evolution based on simple neural networks is constructed, and it is shown that a population of communicating agents can learn progressively better descriptions of its environment.
Abstract
It has been proposed (Richerson and Boyd, 2008) that human intelligence is underpinned by a ratchet-like process called Cultural Evolution in which ideas, originated by individuals, can selectively spread by social learning and replace older, less fruitful ones. Useful ideas can thus accumulate beyond the lifetime of individuals. Although both social and individual learning are thought to be achieved by the selective activity-dependent adjustment of synaptic strengths in an artificial neural net-like manner, there have been relatively few attempts to incorporate neural networks into Cultural Evolution models. This has led to controversy and uncertainty about how cultural traits are created, transformed, transmitted and selected. We have constructed a transparent model of Cultural Evolution based on simple neural networks, and here we show that a population of communicating agents can learn progressively better descriptions of its environment. Specifically we generate input vectors by linearly combining hidden"causes", which agents can learn from in a nonlinear, Hebbian, manner, thus discovering synaptic weights that"unmix"the data to reveal the hidden causes. We previously showed that if agents can communicate their current estimates of hidden causes to other agents, in a selective manner we call"Light", the interacting population can learn unmixing weights under conditions where most noninteracting individuals cannot. Here we show that with"Light"a population can learn progressively better solutions, in a ratchet-like manner. Although our model is highly simplified, this simplicity allows insight into cultural evolution mechanisms that have hitherto been obscure, and provides a stepping stone to more complex, but still relatively transparent, analyses.
Cognition and culture have long been treated as parallel objects of study, joined more by metaphor than by mechanism. We argue they are co-constituted in a manner now empirically tractable: subjectivities can be measured as local trajectories through a high-dimensional cultural field, and the field is itself the aggreg...
Douglas Guilbeault, Bhargav Srinivasa Desikan, James A. Evans· 0 citations
This work develops parallelism in AI development and interpret multigenerational model populations in terms of sexual and asexual reproduction, formally recombining the two fields.
Evolved Plastic Artificial Neural Networks (EPANNs) consist of two principal processes, the first, evolution, and the second, development and in-life learning. In the context of the origins of social = learning, very few studies have been carried out using ALIFE models based on EPANN requirements. Studies in this field...
Hugh Charterton, James M. Borg, Anikó Ekárt· 0 citations
It is shown that the vector representations of a variety of neural networks can be closely approximated with symbolic structures, providing a potential way to reconcile longstanding symbolic conceptions of intelligence with the vector-based nature of modern AI.
R. Thomas McCoy, Paul Soulos, Tal Linzen et al.· 2 citations
It is shown that AI-discovered strategies propagate and persist in human populations, producing cultural shifts when non-trivial, learnable, and advantageous.
L. Brinkmann, Thomas F. Eisenmann, Anne-Marie Nussberger et al.· Nature Communications· 2 citations
Sterelny argues that the driving force of human evolution lies in positive feedback generated by interactions among ecological, informational, and reproductive cooperation. Humans shared information necessary for survival and reproduction and constructed cooperative niches; dual inheritance, niche construction, phenoty...
H. Jo, Kyoung-eun Yang· Research Institute for Life...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.