Skip to content
Review Open access

Translating Genomic Competencies Into Cancer Nursing Practice: A Scoping Review.

Jul 2026 · Journal of Clinical Nursing · 0 citations · 60 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The gap between the conceptualisation of genomic competencies and their operationalisation within oncology settings is addressed, particularly in relation to cancer nursing roles, and the need for workforce and service-level approaches to support the integration of genomics into cancer care is highlighted.

Abstract

Genomics-informed cancer care is central to precision oncology; however, integrating genomic competencies into routine practice remains challenging. Despite the development of competency frameworks, limited clarity exists regarding how these competencies are operationalised within oncology settings.

Aim

To synthesise and critically examine how genomic competencies are conceptualised across the literature, identify areas of convergence and gaps and examine implications for clinical implementation and cancer nursing workforce development.

Design

Scoping review.

Methods

The review followed Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and was reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. DATA SOURCES CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, Google Scholar and grey literature sources were searched (2010-2026). Evidence describing genomic competencies for healthcare professionals was included. Data were extracted and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results

Forty-one sources were included. One overarching theme (holistic patient-centred care), two major themes (genomic knowledge and genomic literacy) and seven interconnected competency domains were identified: social, ethical and legal considerations, communication, assessment, care planning, collaboration, professional practice and systems and process. Although these domains were consistently described across the literature, competencies were frequently articulated at a high level with limited specificity regarding their application within genomics-informed cancer care and oncology workflows.

Conclusion

Genomic competencies are well described across healthcare frameworks; however, a significant gap exists between their conceptualisation and translation into cancer care practice. While educational initiatives support genomic knowledge development, integration requires sustained workforce and implementation approaches that enable competencies to be enacted through clinically embedded oncology roles, pathways and service models. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Existing genomic competencies provide a foundation for education and practice; however, their application within cancer care requires contextualisation within oncology workflows and roles. Aligning competencies with cancer nursing practice may support development of clinically relevant pathways and workforce models for genomics-informed care. IMPACT This review highlights the need for workforce and service-level approaches, including clinically embedded nursing roles, to support the integration of genomics into cancer care. WHAT PROBLEM DID THE STUDY ADDRESS?: Global healthcare systems are working to integrate genomic testing into routine cancer care; however, there is limited clarity on how existing genomic competency frameworks translate into clinical practice. This review addresses the gap between the conceptualisation of genomic competencies and their operationalisation within oncology settings, particularly in relation to cancer nursing roles. WHAT WERE THE MAIN FINDINGS?: Genomic competencies are consistently described across the literature but are often articulated at a high level and lack specificity for application in cancer care. While these competencies align with established nursing capabilities, education alone is insufficient to support their implementation, highlighting a gap between competency frameworks and clinical practice. WHERE AND ON WHOM WILL THE RESEARCH HAVE AN IMPACT?: This review demonstrates that the challenge is no longer defining genomic competencies, but creating the clinical, educational and organisational conditions that enable genomic competencies to be enacted within routine cancer care. REPORTING

Method

Inductive thematic analysis with findings descriptively summarised and narratively reported according to JBI methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Sep 2026

Nursing and precision oncology: Scoping review.

PURPOSE Next-generation sequencing (NGS) integration has established Molecular Tumor Boards (MTBs) as the standard for personalized oncology care. However, specific nursing genomic competencies and clinical functions required remain poorly defined. This scoping review maps existing evidence to identify essential genomi...

F. Buono, Lorena Salvini, D. Cortinovis et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Professional competencies of nurses in palliative care: a systematic review

Palliative care is essential for improving the quality of life for patients with life-limiting illnesses and their families. Nurses, as the primary providers of this care, require comprehensive professional competencies spanning clinical, communication, ethical, psychosocial, spiritual, leadership, and informatic...

Zahra Khalilzadeh-Farsangi, Samaneh Fallah-Karimi · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Nursing contributions within the one health framework: a scoping review with strategic recommendations

The One Health approach integrates human, animal, and ecosystem health. Despite alignment with nursing practice, its role remains underexplored. This review aimed to identify and map nursing contributions that align with One Health principles across different contexts. A scoping review was conducted follow...

S. Fernandes, Júlio Belo Fernandes · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Nursing Competency: A Synthesis of Qualitative Evidence.

It is found that the region's nursing profession is undergoing a profound transformation from "technical operational labor" to "knowledge-intensive profession" and may provide references for educational system reform, clinical training, and career path planning and policy formulation.

Jun-Lin Yang, Na Wang, Bi Guan et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jan 2026

Factors Influencing Clinical Reasoning Among Clinical Nurses: An Integrative Review Using the Decision‐Making Ecology Model

Background Clinical reasoning (CR) is a complex, context‐dependent process that is essential for safe nursing care. Existing reviews have primarily focused on nursing students rather than practicing clinical nurses. Rapid changes in patient acuity and the increasing integration of digital technologies into healthcare h...

Ju-Hee Lee, Deokhyun Lee, Hyeran Park · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

How to Build Health Practitioners Research Capacity: An Umbrella Review

Background Building research capacity, culture and capability (RCCC) among healthcare practitioners is essential for evidence-informed care. No umbrella review has synthesised review-level evidence on RCCC across professions and settings. Objective To synthesise and critically appraise systematic reviews on documented...

Victoria Headlam, Jacqueline Penney, H. Hoang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.