Jun 2026· Journal of Burma Studies· Vol 30, pp. 159 - 208· 0 citations· 16 references
Abstract
Abstract:Language variation in the Greater Burma Zone—particularly Burma—remains under-described and under-theorized. Descriptions of language variation are caught up in taking language as a marker of ethnicity. Language variation, including the development of dialects, has come about in part through language contact, but the effects of language cannot be seen through the usual practices of historical or comparative linguistics and their projects to classify languages and ethnicities. Burmese dialect speakers tend to live in more highly multilingual contexts than do the majority of Standard Burmese speakers. Recognizing the unusual features of Tavoyan—especially aspects of its sound system—as the result of language contact sheds light on a history of linguistic, hence social, contact with speakers of Karen languages. This past of contact with Karen speakers and widespread multilingualism are precisely the aspects of social history that historical sources do not capture. Tavoyan epitomizes the situation in countless other speech communities in the Greater Burma Zone, whose pasts are largely absent from history. In its sounds and syntax, the Tavoyan dialect tells us of the social history of the speech community: Tavoyans tend to think of themselves as a local embodiment of the supra-regional Bamā identity. Despite such ties, the Tavoyan community is much like other groups in the Greater Burma Zone who "lack" history in the sense of written records. In such a context, the study of language itself can serve as a proxy for other kinds of history and can reveal something of the social past of a community.
South Estonian has traditionally been classified in Estonian dialectology as a dialect group of Estonian, whereas historical-comparative linguistics has increasingly recognised it as an early-diverging Finnic language. At the same time, its contemporary varieties—Võro, Seto, Mulgi, and Tartu—have followed different soc...
Abstract This paper investigates how speakers of Namibian German, a vital minority language in present-day Namibia, phonologically adapt borrowings. A quantitative study of spoken data from the corpus DNam reveals that nearly every examined phonological feature varies between phonologically non-integrated (e.g., Afrika...
This paper expands the analysis of competence in non-standard varieties in Kalmyk across generations. It examines how non-family pathways to language acquisition contribute to the persistence of linguistic competence over time and facilitate the inclusion of younger generations of speakers into the Kalmyk speech co...
Vlada V. Baranova· International Journal of Bil...· 1 citation
Research on sound change, language kinship, and protolanguage reconstruction in Indonesia remains limited, given the number of existing languages. The purpose of this study is to explore the results of studies published over the last 10 years (2015–2025) and to identify the application of theory and methodology, as wel...
Nadra Nadra, Reniwati Reniwati, M. Yusdi et al.· GERAM· 0 citations
This study investigates a language sub-variety within Central Kurdish (CK henceforth). The sub-variety, spoken by a tribe known as Jaff, is spoken in the northeast of Iraq and west of Iran. The language variety is identical to CK in terms of grammar and vocabulary; it has its own phonetic features. In the literature of...
T. Hamid, Bekhal Hussain· Sulaimani Journal for Humani...· 0 citations
While previous studies of Mongolian regional dialects have consistently classified the Khövsgöl Buryat language under the category of “Buryat dialects”, no empirical linguistic example has been documented in academic literature. Driven by a research interest in whether the Khövsgöl Buryat heritage language still preser...