Aug 2026· Frontiers in Immunology· Vol 17· 0 citations· 360 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This review delineates the principal neoadjuvant immunotherapy biomarkers implicated in breast cancer and elucidate their action mechanisms and summarizes the ongoing and reported clinical studies to offer a coherent perspective on the evolving role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in breast cancer management.
Abstract
Despite advances in first-line therapy, a subset of breast cancer patients—particularly those with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)—continue to experience unfavorable prognosis. Recently, the addition of neoadjuvant immunotherapy has been intensively studied and widely adopted to improve clinical outcomes of patients with breast cancer. Based on encouraging results from large-scale clinical trials such as KEYNOTE-522 and IMpassion031, the range of drugs evaluated has expanded from atezolizumab to other programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death-ligand 1(PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab and avelumab. Furthermore, the pursuit of targeted therapies has extended to other biomarkers, including Forkhead Box Protein P3 (FOXP3) and Wilms’ Tumor gene 1 (WT1). Despite these advancements, the heterogeneity in trial design, participant demographics, endpoints, and other confounding variables has resulted in divergent conclusions across clinical studies. In this review, we delineate the principal neoadjuvant immunotherapy biomarkers implicated in breast cancer and elucidate their action mechanisms. We also summarize the ongoing and reported clinical studies, aiming to offer a coherent perspective on the evolving role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in breast cancer management.
A precision immunotherapy framework that integrates TNBC molecular subgroups, validated and dynamic biomarker models, rational combinations, resistance mechanisms, and emerging tools is proposed, including single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, multi-omics, and AI-assisted stratification to improve response d...
Shun-Hao Peng, Meng-Yao Qin, G. Song et al.· Frontiers in Immunology· 0 citations
Current treatment strategies across breast cancer subtypes are summarized, emerging therapies are highlighted, and the expanding APP role is emphasized.
W. Tobin· JAAPA : official journal of...· 0 citations
BACKGROUND Despite therapeutic advances in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), residual disease (RD) following neoadjuvant therapy remains a key predictor of a worse prognosis and obstacle to improving patient outcomes. METHODS To better characterize RD and identify survival-associated features, we perfor...
P. D. Rädler, B. Felsheim, A. Fernández-Martínez et al.· Journal of Clinical Investig...· 0 citations
No validated biomarkers beyond PD-L1 currently guide immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and how tumors remodel their microenvironment in response to ICI remains incompletely understood. We perform a temporal analysis of patients with advanced TNBC treated with chemo-imm...
N. Van Renne, E. Agostinetto, Andrea Joaquín-García et al.· Cell Reports Medicine· 0 citations
Recent advances in NSCLC with established alterations are summarized, including EGFR, ALK, ROS1, KRAS, BRAF, RET, HER2, MET, and NTRK, and emerging targets are discussed, and emerging targets, such as NRG1 fusions, MTAP loss, and SMARCA4 deficiency are discussed.
L. Hendriks, Jessica J. Lin, D. S. Tan et al.· The Lancet Respiratory Medic...· 2 citations
The immunological characteristics of TNBC, the current status of ICI-based therapy, and the underlying mechanisms of resistance are reviewed, which summarizes the biological rationale for combining RT with ICIs in the treatment of TNBC and explores the impact of different RT dose-fractionation regimens, treatment seque...
Lu Wang, Xin Bai, Fan Wang et al.· Frontiers in Immunology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.