Jul 2026· The Journal of craniofacial surgery (Print)· 0 citations· 33 references
Medicine
TL;DR
In appropriately selected patients, EaCFR and ECFR are effective management approaches for ASB tumors and are shown to be effective management approaches without the morbidity of open surgery.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Anterior skull base (ASB) tumors are rare and comprise a variety of pathologies. In recent years, the surgical management of ASB tumors has undergone a paradigm shift from open craniofacial resection (CFR) to minimally invasive endoscopic approaches. Endoscopic-assisted (EaCFR) and entirely endoscopic (ECFR) CFR have shown equivalent oncological outcomes without the morbidity of open surgery. This study presents our tertiary center experience and outcomes with endoscopic approaches for ASB tumors.
Methods
A retrospective review of all patients who underwent EaCFR and ECFR for ASB tumors from January 2010 to December 2024 at Singapore General Hospital was performed. Relevant patient characteristics, histologic diagnoses, treatment protocols, and perioperative data were collected and analyzed to determine complication rates, recurrence, and mortality.
Results
Thirty-seven patients were included in the study, with 22 (59.5%) undergoing ECFR and 15 (40.5%) undergoing EaCFR. The mean age was 51.5 years. The most common presenting symptoms were epistaxis (70.3%) and nasal obstruction (48.6%). The primary histologic diagnoses were olfactory neuroblastoma (62.2%), sarcoma (13.5%), adenocarcinoma (8.1%), and sinonasal carcinoma (8.1%). R0 resection was achieved in 26 (70.3%) cases, and intraoperative hemorrhage necessitating staged surgery occurred in 2 (5.4%) cases. The mean follow-up duration was 4.6 years. There were no cases of perioperative mortality. Eight (21.6%) cases had postoperative complications, including 1 (2.7%) case of cerebrospinal fluid leak after completion of adjuvant radiotherapy. The 5-year recurrence-free, disease-specific, and overall survival rates were 61.8%, 94.2%, and 80.1%, respectively.
Conclusion
In appropriately selected patients, EaCFR and ECFR are effective management approaches for ASB tumors.
EATA appears to be a feasible minimally invasive option for carefully selected maxillofacial tumors in deep or esthetically sensitive anatomical regions, and its application requires strict patient selection, anatomical risk control, and adherence to oncologic principles.
Shuai Chen, Guan-Ru Wang, He-Yi Tang et al.· The Laryngoscope· 0 citations
Open anterior skull base reconstruction has been reported as feasible across heterogeneous clinical series; however, the predominantly retrospective evidence does not support comparative conclusions regarding reconstructive superiority.
L. Cardoso, M. Ferreira, Murtaja Satea et al.· The Journal of craniofacial...· 0 citations
To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of endoscopically-assisted microsurgery in large recurrent craniopharyngiomas.
We reported 25 Patients who underwent endoscopically assisted micro neurosurgery for large craniopharyngioma and assessed the outcome of excision and its correlation to morbidity and mortal...
Mohamed Gabr, A. Mahmoud, A. Ashry· Journal of Neurosciences in...· 0 citations
Abstract Background and Study Aims Current guidelines recommend en bloc endoscopic resection (ER) for ampullary tumors up to 3 cm and surgery for those exceeding 4 cm, based on low-quality evidence. Robust clinical data and operative experience with ER for tumors >3 cm are relatively limited. This study aimed to invest...
Tian-Yu Zhang, Zhang-Han Chen, Dong-Li He et al.· Endoscopy International Open· 0 citations