Aug 2026· The Journal of Business and Artificial Intelligence· Vol 3· 0 citations· 16 references
TL;DR
This paper synthesizes current research and industry reports to examine how GenAI and agentic AI are transforming audit practice and to identify strategies for preserving talent pipelines while enhancing professional judgment in an AI-enabled audit environment.
Abstract
The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and emerging agentic AI systems is reshaping the audit profession, with significant implications for workforce development, audit methodologies, and human–AI collaboration. Although public narratives often depict AI as a threat to early-career roles, evidence from industry reports and field studies reveals a more nuanced transformation. Firms are reallocating routine, task-based audit work to AI tools, potentially contributing to reduced early-career hiring but simultaneously elevating the cognitive demands placed on auditors. Audit methodologies are also evolving, with AI enhancing risk assessment, journal entry testing, anomaly detection, documentation quality, and emerging assurance domains. These changes support fuller population analysis, greater analytical depth, and richer insights. Across these developments, human–AI collaboration is becoming a defining feature of modern auditing, requiring auditors to supervise, validate, and contextualize AI-generated outputs. This paper synthesizes current research and industry reports to examine how GenAI and agentic AI are transforming audit practice and to identify strategies for preserving talent pipelines while enhancing professional judgment in an AI-enabled audit environment.
An early-stage adoption pattern in which auditors perceive strong AI benefits – particularly in automation, data analysis, and text processing – yet willingness to implement AI remains moderate is suggested, consistent with an audit context where adoption requires not only expected gains but also confidence in explaina...
Natalia Alonso-Morales, Alejandro Sáez-Martín, A. López-Hernández et al.· International Journal of Pub...· 0 citations
Investigating how AI reshapes intersectoral agility and redefines staffing and workforce planning logics in engineering consulting firms reveals four persistent tensions shaping augmented work: decision, transparency, agency and learning paradoxes.
Asmaa Abid-Baudin, Thibault Desbois, Karine Sacepe et al.· European Conference on Knowl...· 0 citations
This Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly compelling the auditing profession to re-evaluate its long-standing professional models. The picture that emerges from the existing literature remains unclear as to what auditors themselves think about this technology or how it shapes their role and identity as professionals...
Ridha Shabou, A. Sobaih· International Journal of Dig...· 0 citations
AI systems are increasingly used to support consequential organizational decisions, heightening concerns about fairness, reliability, and accountability. Regulators have begun to respond through audit and disclosure mandates, yet credible assurance over AI systems remains underdeveloped and it is unclear who should p...
This study is one of the first studies to empirically examine the specific construct of AI reliance within the context of public-sector auditors in a special-autonomy region such as Aceh, while extending automation bias theory by positioning professional skepticism as a cognitive buffering mechanism.
Luthfiar Ramiady, Hendri Bin Muhammad Nur· Sumber Informasi Manajemen B...· 0 citations
As artificial intelligence (AI) agents assume the information-routing functions that have defined organisational hierarchy since the Roman Army, the traditional organisational chart is giving way to a new form: an hourglass. In this emerging structure, a broad base of agents handles execution, a concentrated top layer...