Skip to content

Unique contributions of acoustic and cognitive factors to spatial release from masking

Aug 2026 · Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · Vol 159, pp. A105-A105 · 0 citations

Abstract

Spatial Release from Masking (SRM) refers to the improvement in speech intelligibility that occurs when target and masker sounds are spatially separated. While traditionally attributed to acoustic cues, such as interaural time and level differences, growing evidence indicates that non-acoustic factors also shape the magnitude of SRM. This study quantifies the relative contributions of acoustic cue sensitivity and cognitive abilities on SRM using behavioral speech-in-noise tasks paired with a comprehensive cognitive battery. Cognitive factors were assessed using the Trail Making Task (attention shifting and processing speed), Flanker Task (inhibitory control), Stroop Task (interference resolution), and a working memory task. Results show that acoustic cues robustly support SRM in predominantly energetic masking conditions; however, under informational masking, individual differences in cognitive performance significantly modulate SRM magnitude. Individuals with stronger inhibitory control, faster attentional switching, and higher selective auditory attentional capacity demonstrated greater SRM, even with identical acoustic cues. These findings highlight SRM as a joint outcome of peripheral auditory processing and central cognitive mechanisms. Understanding how these factors interact has implications for hearing-aid processing strategies, assessment of hearing impairment, and the design of spatial audio systems that better support real-world communication.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Jan 2026

How Temporal Overlap in Task Processing and Acoustic Load Affect Listening Effort in Adults

Listening effort reflects the cognitive resources allocated to overcome obstacles in auditory processing. While acoustic degradation (e.g., noise, reverberation) is known to affect listening effort, little is known about how temporal overlap of task processing influences effortful listening in adults. This study examin...

J. Seitz, Jana R. Berger, Maria Anastasia Sinarso et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Informational masking modulates semantic processing during recognition of syntactically complex speech: evidence from pupillometry

Introduction Speech perception in adverse listening environments depends not only on the quality of the acoustic signal but also on listeners’ ability to recruit higher-level linguistic information. Although semantic constraints are known to influence recognition of syntactically complex speech, it remains unclear how...

Jing Shen, G. DeDe · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Distinct Roles of Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Speech-in-Noise Perception

Difficulty perceiving speech in noise is the primary complaint of patients seeking hearing healthcare, even absent overt losses in audiometric thresholds. Yet current clinical practice largely focuses on sensory function while ignoring the potentially outsized effects of executive function on everyday suprathreshold li...

Sharadhi Bharadwaj, Catherine Dymowski, Erin Batik et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Intelligible distracting speech disrupts early auditory attention

Intelligible speech disrupts selective auditory attention more than an unintelligible stream. However, low-level acoustic features of intelligible speech are relatively similar to target speech, confounding results. While controlling acoustic similarity and limiting energetic masking, we examined how masker intelligibi...

Benjamin N. Richardson, Maanasa Guru Adimurthy, Christopher A. Brown et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Neural signatures of auditory distraction and cognitive demand during working memory performance

Cognitive performance in real-world environments often requires maintaining working memory under simultaneous cognitive demand and environmental distraction. Although both factors have independently been associated with alterations in attention and executive control, their combined neural effects remain insufficiently...

M. Leitner, S. C. Wriessnegger · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.