Skip to content

PAC-Private Autoregressive Generation: Calibrating Noise to Ensemble Disagreement

Sep 2026 · 1 citation · 34 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

These contributions are extending PAC privacy to autoregressive generation, handling adaptive self-generated contexts, and introducing coupled decoding that preserves privacy accounting while avoiding greedy degeneration.

Abstract

Language models adapted on private text are often served through APIs, so privacy leakage occurs through generated outputs rather than exposed weights. Private prediction protects these releases. Methods such as PMixED incur privacy cost at each release and increasingly rely on the public model over long horizons. PAC privacy instead calibrates noise to output variability across possible secrets, adding less noise when predictions are stable. To our knowledge, PAC-private prediction has not previously been extended from classification to autoregressive generation. We construct $m=128$ overlapping worlds from the private corpus, with each record appearing in exactly $m/2$ worlds, and train one adapter per world over a frozen public model. The realized world is the secret. At each token, the public model defines a candidate set, the worlds vote, and their posterior-weighted disagreement determines the PAC noise; unanimity requires no calibration noise. We prove $I(S;Y_{1:T}) \leq I(S;H_T) \leq bT$. Our contributions are extending PAC privacy to autoregressive generation, handling adaptive self-generated contexts, and introducing coupled decoding that preserves privacy accounting while avoiding greedy degeneration. On WikiText-103 with GPT-2-small, we retain 74% of the fine-tuning gain at a per-token budget of $2^{-32}$, while membership-inference success is bounded by 51.08% after $10^6$ tokens; posterior-entropy estimates of leakage are roughly 17% of the charged budget. Inference privacy is not content protection: even when membership advantage on a memorized canary is indistinguishable from zero, the canary is emitted at the same rate. Against PMixED under matched membership-inference bounds on the same data universe and test set, we retain 98% of non-private headroom from $10^2$ to $10^6$ tokens, versus at most 56%, with no crossover.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Canaries in the Bank: Auditing User-Level Privacy in Private Evolution

A protocol-aware empirical audit is introduced in which the server commits to a single shared candidate bank and replaces roughly 1% of its entries with probes derived from a known, non-private canary, to quantify the gap between formal worst-case privacy and leakage achievable through protocol-valid candidate-bank man...

Sai Aparna Aketi, Enayat Ullah, Shripad Gade · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Privacy Without Regret: Differentially Private Inference-Time Alignment

Private Inference-Time Pessimism (PrivITP) is introduced, which combines $\chi^2$-regularized rejection sampling with a two-phase Gaussian mechanism, and achieves ex-post $(\epsilon,\delta)$-DP with a privacy cost independent of the number of responses, cleanly decouples the regularization parameter from the privacy pa...

I. Jain, Nandini Bhattad, Sayak Ray Chowdhury · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Sep 2026

FinancialAuditBench: Benchmark Construction under Differential Privacy Using Real-World Priors

FinancialAuditBench is introduced, a benchmark for evaluating agents on financial statement audit tasks, along with a framework for systematically generating synthetic engagements for model evaluation and training in privacy-sensitive domains.

Jerry Huang, Sarvesh Babu, Matt Van Buren et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Oct 2026

Sleeping Secrets: How Fine-Tuning Reawakens Privacy Risks in Language Models

Beyond adapting Large Language Models (LLMs) to specialized applications, fine-tuning has recently been shown to recover private information that is no longer accessible through direct queries. Previous fine-tuning recovery attacks, however, require genuine private supervision drawn from the same distribution, i.e., th...

Jian-Hong Li, Jia-Hao Chen, Yuwen Pu et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

High-Dimensional Asymptotics and Dataset Selection for Private Transfer Learning

To commit to buying external data or participate in collaborative learning, one must decide whether the additional data will improve prediction enough to justify the cost. This comes with several challenges: (i) the decision often relies only on aggregated statistics available publicly, rather than individual-level dat...

Filip Kovacevic, Edwige Cyffers, Stefano Sarao Mannelli et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Pinocchio: Fast Uncertainty Estimates for Black-Box Language Models

Pinocchio is introduced, an external calibrator that estimates the correctness of responses from black-box API models that needs only a single forward pass to generate an uncertainty estimate and requires no access to the target model's logits, weights, or internal states.

K. D. Hayes, Arka Pal, Hao-Song Zhang et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 12, 2026

Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring

StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.