Skip to content

Evaluating Bayesian Variable Selection Approaches for Nonlinear Random Effects Models.

Aug 2026 · Multivariate Behavioral Research · pp. 1-20 · 0 citations · 29 references
Medicine

Abstract

Longitudinal data modeling attracts special interest from researchers and practitioners because of its capacity to help understand individual and mean trends of growth and development over time. One feature of longitudinal design is the collection of extensive information on participants to help explain the underlying growth process. However, selecting which covariates or independent variables (i.e., predictors) to include in a statistical model is challenging especially with the goals of avoiding both overfitting and underfitting. The present study demonstrates and compares multiple Bayesian variable selection methods for the selection of covariates to explain longitudinal growth processes, including both shrinkage methods (e.g., horseshoe) and stochastic variable search method (e.g., spike-and-slab priors and their extension to a Normal Mixture of Inverse Gammas), via an extensive Monte Carlo simulation study using a piecewise random effects model with unknown change point as an example. Our goal is to provide recommendations for researchers and practitioners about the advantages and limitations of Bayesian variable selection methods for variable selection in longitudinal studies, including model convergence and parameter estimation precision and accuracy.

View source

Similar papers

Aug 2026

Bayesian variable selection for joint models of heterogeneous longitudinal variables and a binary outcome

Biomedical studies often collect mixed-type longitudinal data (e.g., clinical, lifestyle) to identify predictors of a binary health outcome. A common analytical challenge is to link these irregularly collected variables to the outcome, particularly when the number of potential predictors is large. While joint models (J...

Lingpeng Shan, Michelle J. Naughton, E. Paskett et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Bayesian model comparison for random effects probit models with missing covariates

For model comparison in random effects probit models with incompletely observed covariates, this paper develops a Bayesian data-augmentation workflow in which latent Gaussian responses, random effects, and missing covariate values are updated within a common augmented sampling scheme. Because specifying a fully param...

Michael Bergrab · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Selective Inference in Growth Curve Models

Growth curve models are widely used in psychological research, and variable selection can help identify baseline characteristics associated with longitudinal heterogeneity. However, conventional inference after data-driven variable selection can be invalid because the same outcome data are used for both selection and i...

Hao-Chen Lei, Qian Zhang, Hong-Yuan Cao · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Estimating Functions Inference to Semi‐Parametric Additive Models for Skewed And/Or Heavy‐Tailed Longitudinal Data

In many fields of research, it is common to conduct experiments where several observations of the response variable are made on the same subject over non‐random conditions, generating longitudinal studies. A wide variety of techniques deal with this type of data when analysing population variations, many based on estim...

J. D. de Freitas, Caio L. N. Azevedo, Juvêncio S. Nobre · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Quasi-randomization-based inference for multivariate Mann-Whitney effects under random missingness

Marginal Mann-Whitney effects are widely used across various fields of research, and extensions of this estimand have been developed in many directions in statistical methodology. In this paper, we focus on an extensions for repeated measurements and factorial designs subject to randomly missing data. In a previous wor...

Dennis Dobler, Jörg-Tobias Kuhn, L. Amro et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Valid Test for Multi-arm Trials with Generalized Linear Models Under Covariate-adaptive Randomization

A new inference method for conducting multiple-treatment comparisons involving endpoints within the generalized linear model (GLM) framework under covariate-adaptive randomization (CAR) that can effectively control Type I error while potentially improving power.

Guannan Zhai, Fei-Fang Hu · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.