Skip to content
Open access

Bayesian marginalized zero-inflated Poisson model with random effects for single-case experimental designs: A simulation study.

Jul 2026 · Psychological methods · 1 citation
Medicine

Abstract

Analyzing zero-inflated count data in single-case experimental designs presents a significant analytical challenge. Although traditional zero-inflated generalized linear mixed models are available, they estimate a conditional treatment effect given an individual coming from the count process, which often mismatches the applied researcher's interest in the overall effect of an intervention for each subject. These conditional models also face interpretational and estimation challenges within the small-sample context of single-case experimental designs. This study introduces and evaluates a Bayesian marginalized zero-inflated Poisson (mZIP) model with random effects. This framework reparameterizes the model to estimate the marginal intervention effect, aligning the statistical estimand with the typical research question. A Monte Carlo simulation study was conducted to evaluate the mZIP model's performance. We compared its performance with other methods that also target the marginal treatment effect: the log response ratio (LRR), a Poisson generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM), and a negative binomial GLMM. Simulation results indicate that the Bayesian mZIP model consistently recovers unbiased estimates of the marginal treatment effect and provides reliable statistical inference. The LRR, Poisson GLMM, and negative binomial GLMM produced biased estimates for the marginal effect under conditions with smallest sample size and highest zero-inflation rate. They also suffered from low coverage rate, making their inferential statistics invalid. The LRR indicated lower statistical power than the mZIP model. We apply the mZIP model to two empirical data sets to illustrate its application and interpretation. Finally, we discuss the distinction between conditional and marginal estimands, as well as the limitations and future directions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Bayesian model comparison for random effects probit models with missing covariates

For model comparison in random effects probit models with incompletely observed covariates, this paper develops a Bayesian data-augmentation workflow in which latent Gaussian responses, random effects, and missing covariate values are updated within a common augmented sampling scheme. Because specifying a fully param...

Michael Bergrab · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Quasi-randomization-based inference for multivariate Mann-Whitney effects under random missingness

Marginal Mann-Whitney effects are widely used across various fields of research, and extensions of this estimand have been developed in many directions in statistical methodology. In this paper, we focus on an extensions for repeated measurements and factorial designs subject to randomly missing data. In a previous wor...

Dennis Dobler, Jörg-Tobias Kuhn, L. Amro et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

A Bayesian approach to estimate transition models forzero-inflated count data

Zero-inflated count data are commonly modelled by mixing a degenerate distribution at zero with a Poisson or negative binomial component, thereby imposing a parametric form on the counts. The transition model of Berger and Tutz instead specifies the conditional probability of moving from one count to the next and treat...

Qusai Shakhatreh, Ayat Almomani, M. Obeidat · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Robust Inference to Parameter Estimates in the Zero-Inflated Generalized Poisson: The Risk Factors Affecting the Fertility Rate

Introduction: Fertility data frequently exhibit excess zeros, overdispersion, and within-cluster correlation, rendering conventional count models inadequate. Methods: We propose a multilevel zero-inflated generalized Poisson (ZIGP) model based on the Robust Expectation– Solution (RES) algorithm. The model comprises tw...

Eghbal Zandkarimi, A. Moghimbeigi · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Mastering a simulation-based parametric method to obtain bias-corrected point estimates and sampling variance for effect sizes

Meta-analyses require an effect-size estimate and its corresponding sampling variance from primary studies. For some effect size statistics, however, estimators of sampling variance are unavailable, requiring new derivations. Traditionally, such formulas are obtained using hand-derived Taylor expansions (the delta...

S. Nakagawa, Ayumi Mizuno, Coralie Williams et al. · 0 citations
Open access Mar 2025

Integrating Meta-Analysis Into a Specific Study (InMASS) for Estimating the Target-Population Average Treatment Effect.

Randomized controlled trials remain the benchmark for estimating treatment effects, yet practical constraints often restrict sample sizes in a prespecified target population. In such settings, evidence from completed trials is frequently available only in aggregate form, which precludes direct individual-level integrat...

Keisuke Hanada, M. Kojima · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.