Skip to content

What Fixed-Rollout pass@k Evaluations Can Identify

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 14 references
Mathematics Computer Science

TL;DR

This work gives an exact, conservative one-coordinate finite-task confidence certificate and a reporting standard separating direct estimates, identified sets, and model-conditioned forecasts, and gives exact count-law-preserving constructions with incompatible extrapolations with incompatible extrapolations.

Abstract

Repeated-sampling evaluations increasingly extrapolate pass@k far beyond the number n of samples collected per problem. We show that, in the pooled/random-task conditional-Binomial model, fixed-n success counts identify only the n free moments of the latent per-task success distribution. Consequently, direct pass@k is identified for k<= n, but generic extrapolated pass@k, tail exponents, and tail constants are not identified for k>n, even with arbitrarily many exchangeable tasks at the same rollout budget. This is stronger than the observation that the usual estimator is undefined beyond n: it characterizes the information missing from the fixed-depth count-law experiment. We give exact count-law-preserving constructions with incompatible extrapolations, state the exceptional unique-extension case, and compute sharp population identified intervals through Hausdorff principal representations. On the public 10,000-rollout-per-problem release of Brown et al., counterfactual n = 16 evaluations leave failure at k = 1000 ambiguous by factors from 1.5 to over 2,600 across four MATH/GSM8K/CodeContests configurations. The calibration shows that intermediate-scale failure share alone does not determine width. Our result does not reject parametric inference-time scaling laws; it supplies the nonparametric baseline against which their assumptions can be evaluated. We give an exact, conservative one-coordinate finite-task confidence certificate and a reporting standard separating direct estimates, identified sets, and model-conditioned forecasts.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

What pass@k Cannot Measure: Evaluating Diversity and Capability Retention after Post-Training

pass@$k$, the fraction of problems a model solves within $k$ sampled attempts, is the field's default protocol for deciding whether reinforcement-learning (RL) post-training on verifiable rewards improved a model. At the population level, pass@$k$ depends only on a problem's probability of a correct sample, with no ter...

Subham Rath, R. Dandekar, R. Dandekar et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Equal Budgets Change the Verdict: Finite-Sample Bias and a Matched-Budget Re-Examination of Diversity-Enhanced flowMC Ensembles

On two real Bayesian posteriors scored against long NUTS references, uniform pooling improved on the sample-count-matched single run under marginal JS, energy distance, and MMD2 in every recorded run, while the aggregation’s deficit is confined to the biased marginal metric.

Ming-Yu Shi, Fan Zhang · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Knowing When to Stop: Bayesian Optimal Stopping for LLM Evaluations

LLM evaluations often use fixed sampling budgets, testing every item the same number of times even after estimates are precise. We introduce optstop, a precision-based adaptive stopping framework that treats evaluation as a sequential measurement problem: keep sampling where uncertainty remains high, and stop where est...

Toby D. Pilditch · 2 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

What Does a Benford Test Actually Test? Marginal Conformity, Sampling Structure, and Forensic Inference

Benford's law specifies a marginal distribution for significant digits, whereas the usual first-digit Pearson $p$-value is calibrated under an independent multinomial sampling model. We separate these statements with four constructions that share the same one-time or pooled Benford target but have different joint struc...

Arthur Charpentier · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

KITE: Scaling Jev Population Experiments with Sparse Flagship Calibration

KITE queries a typed behavioral kernel once per unique state, then executes populations of any size from the table with event-keyed randomness and common random numbers. An expensive flagship model is reserved for sparse paired anchors that estimate intervention effects. Measured human-model discrepancy is propagated a...

Heng-Yu Li · 3 citations · ⚡1

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.