Skip to content

Beyond Conventional Federated Learning via High-Order Regularization

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 19 references
Computer Science Mathematics

TL;DR

HiFedProx is introduced, which replaces the quadratic penalty with a scale-matched power-type regularizer indexed by p, and combines this geometry with finite-budget stochastic client optimization and same-minibatch Armijo backtracking.

Abstract

Federated clients that perform several local optimization steps can return parameter displacements with widely different magnitudes. The quadratic regularization of FedProx grows linearly with displacement and therefore offers limited control over the contrast between ordinary and unusually large client movements. We here introduce HiFedProx, which replaces the quadratic penalty with a scale-matched power-type regularizer indexed by $p\geq2$. All powers have the same regularization-gradient magnitude at a reference displacement $R$, while every $p>2$ gives a weaker response below $R$ and a stronger response above it. An exact affine reference calculation shows that increasing $p$ compresses relative displacement disparities, although very large powers approach fixed-radius behavior and increase local curvature. HiFedProx combines this geometry with finite-budget stochastic client optimization and same-minibatch Armijo backtracking. In paired five-seed experiments on a frozen 60-writer FEMNIST subset, a common-parameter study over $p\in\{2,3,4,5,6,7,8\}$ shows similar clean-training performance but substantial gains under composite stress. The lowest moderate- and severe-stress losses occur at $p=7$ and $p=6$, improving over $p=2$ by $11.44\%$ and $23.16\%$, respectively. Although displacement-tail ratios continue to decrease through $p=8$, predictive performance peaks in an intermediate range and Armijo trial cost increases with $p$. These results indicate that the exponent should be calibrated rather than maximized. In our experiments, $p=5$--$7$ provides the most useful range.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Scaling Zero-Order Pretraining through Model Sharding

Zero-order optimization (ZO) trains without backpropagation, making it relevant to forward-only hardware and non-differentiable loss, but its gradient variance grows with perturbed dimension, inhibiting large-model training. Sharded Optimization Mixture of Assemblies (SOMA) trains LSTM experts independently on $N$ data...

Francois Chaubard, M. Kochenderfer, Chris Ré · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

How Much Regularization Survives Averaging? Update Masking in Federated Learning

It is proved that when each client draws its own mask, federated averaging weakens that charge by exactly the cohort size, and that giving every client the same mask brings it back by a factor equal to the inverse gradient diversity of the cohort.

Wenhao Yan, Fu Kuroda, Yu-Cheng Jin et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

FedMIX-P: Mixing Local and Global Preconditioners for Federated Vision and Language Model Training

Adaptive preconditioners accelerate model training, but heterogeneous client geometries can bias federated updates even when gradients are evaluated at the same model. Round-start synchronization alone cannot prevent this mismatch from reappearing during local training. We propose \texttt{FedMIX-P}, which mixes shared...

Jun-Kang Liu · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

SplitLite: Low-Rank Residual Compression for Split Learning

SplitLite is proposed, a communication-efficient split federated LoRA fine-tuning method that exploits the low effective rank structure of consecutive-epoch activation and gradient residuals, thereby significantly reducing both activation uplink and gradient downlink traffic.

Tao Li, Yu-Lin Tang, Qi Guo et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Probe-Space Preconditioning for Fast and Stable Zero-Order Training

Backpropagation (BP) dominates deep learning but imposes a massive memory tax. For example, training OPT-30B with Adam requires $\approx$ 600GB of GPU memory (assuming batch size 8 and sequence length 2048). Alternatively, zero-order optimization (ZOO) trains in inference-mode (requiring only $\approx$ 60GB for the sam...

Francois Chaubard, M. Kochenderfer, Chris Ré · 0 citations

Related blog posts

GPT-Lab Aug 28, 2026

We built an AI factory for HVAC control

What does it take to trust AI-driven HVAC optimization? Our AI Model Factory combines agents, machine learning, reinforcement learning and deterministic checks in a governed workflow designed for messy, real-world building data. The post We built an AI factory for HVAC control appeared first on GPT-Lab.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.