Skip to content
#federated learning Open access

Federated OMR for Automated Examination Paper Digitization and Assessment

Unknown authors
Sep 2026 · Applied Sciences · 0 citations · 41 references

TL;DR

The findings suggest the feasibility of Federated Learning for developing privacy-preserving and highly generalizable OMR systems for large-scale educational assessment.

Abstract

In the context of educational digital transformation, automated grading of paper-based examinations faces two challenges: data privacy concerns and data heterogeneity across educational institutions. Existing Optical Mark Recognition systems are predominantly designed under centralized learning paradigms, requiring examination data to be collected and processed at a central server, which may expose sensitive student information. To address this limitation, this paper proposes a federated OMR framework for automated examination paper digitization and assessment in distributed environments. The proposed system consists of five stages, employing YOLO26 for answer-region localization, ORB-based image registration for geometric alignment, and EfficientNet-B0 for answer-state classification, automated grading, and result aggregation. Federated Averaging is utilized to train a global model across five clients representing heterogeneous data domains with different answer-sheet layouts, ink characteristics, and marking styles, without sharing raw data. Experimental results demonstrate that the federated model achieves an ROI-level accuracy of 99.42% and a Macro F1-score of 95.82%. Furthermore, the proposed system attains a Sheet-level accuracy of 84.62%, outperforming local training approaches while achieving performance comparable to centralized learning. These findings suggest the feasibility of Federated Learning for developing privacy-preserving and highly generalizable OMR systems for large-scale educational assessment.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.