Recoverability emerges as a distinct design dimension for agentic communication networks, with open challenges in recovery benchmarking, post-recovery verification, and standardization.
Abstract
Agentic artificial intelligence is increasingly integrated into communication networks, enabling systems that perceive network state, reason over conditions, and execute actions on live infrastructure. As these systems act directly on operational environments, their behavior after failure remains insufficiently characterized: existing evaluation emphasizes throughput, latency, and accuracy, without capturing how systems recover after actions that affect network state. This survey examines agentic artificial intelligence in communication networks through the lens of recoverability, based on a systematically coded corpus of the recent literature. The paper introduces the MATR-R framework, which organizes recoverability around memory awareness, action governance, trust regulation, and recovery capability. At its core lies the R0–R5 graded recovery scale, which classifies post-failure capability on an ordinal scale ranging from detection to learning. The survey further presents a taxonomy of communication-network failure modes, a recovery-aware evaluation framework, and five tutorial scenarios across slicing, cybersecurity, and digital-twin-assisted recovery. The analysis reveals three consistent patterns: containment is the most common recovery level, self-healing is more often claimed than demonstrated, and full autonomy does not coincide with recovery beyond containment. These findings highlight a gap between perceived and verified recovery capability. Recoverability emerges as a distinct design dimension for agentic communication networks, with open challenges in recovery benchmarking, post-recovery verification, and standardization.
Agentic AI systems built on large language models can plan over multiple steps, use external tools, retain information in memory, and coordinate with other agents. These capabilities make them more useful than static language models, but they also introduce new security and operational risks. Untrusted content from web...
Fayeq Jeelani Syed, Rehan Ahmad, Ali Al Bataineh et al.· 0 citations
Recent advances in large language models are pushing IoT systems toward autonomous Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) paradigms, where system behavior depends on protocol semantics, internal state, interaction history, and environmental context. This creates a gap between AI-generated decisions and the behavior o...
Xiao-Yue Ma, Hua-Li Lu, Xiang-Xiang Dai et al.· 2026 IEEE/CIC International...· 0 citations
Zero-day attacks exploit signature-based defenses since the key pieces of evidence used to identify attacks are not present during the training of the model. This paper proposes an Agentic Autonomous Zero-Trust (AAZT) framework that includes: Multimodal Open-set Detection, Evidence-grounded Multi-agent Investigation, C...
The temporal-weight effect, a hazard in AI-to-AI communication where what arrives first acquires unearned authority, is identified and tested in one frontier model in a preregistered 1,908-trial experiment.
This work systematizes MAS security through an execution-centered analysis of 197 works, introducing an A-I-R framework that organizes attacks by adversary position, interaction interface, and resulting system-level risk, unifying otherwise fragmented attack mechanisms across MAS.
Rui Yang, Jun-Jie Xu, Zheng-Yu Liu et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.