Skip to content
Review Open access

Recoverable Agentic AI for Communication Networks: A Survey of Architectures, Trust Regulation, and Failure Recovery

Jul 2026 · Sustainable Machine Intelligence Journal · Vol 14, pp. 136-197 · 0 citations

TL;DR

Recoverability emerges as a distinct design dimension for agentic communication networks, with open challenges in recovery benchmarking, post-recovery verification, and standardization.

Abstract

Agentic artificial intelligence is increasingly integrated into communication networks, enabling systems that perceive network state, reason over conditions, and execute actions on live infrastructure. As these systems act directly on operational environments, their behavior after failure remains insufficiently characterized: existing evaluation emphasizes throughput, latency, and accuracy, without capturing how systems recover after actions that affect network state. This survey examines agentic artificial intelligence in communication networks through the lens of recoverability, based on a systematically coded corpus of the recent literature. The paper introduces the MATR-R framework, which organizes recoverability around memory awareness, action governance, trust regulation, and recovery capability. At its core lies the R0–R5 graded recovery scale, which classifies post-failure capability on an ordinal scale ranging from detection to learning. The survey further presents a taxonomy of communication-network failure modes, a recovery-aware evaluation framework, and five tutorial scenarios across slicing, cybersecurity, and digital-twin-assisted recovery. The analysis reveals three consistent patterns: containment is the most common recovery level, self-healing is more often claimed than demonstrated, and full autonomy does not coincide with recovery beyond containment. These findings highlight a gap between perceived and verified recovery capability. Recoverability emerges as a distinct design dimension for agentic communication networks, with open challenges in recovery benchmarking, post-recovery verification, and standardization.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Review Sep 2026

Trustworthy Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Cybersecurity and Systems Survey on Threat Landscapes, Defense Architectures, and Open Challenges

This survey systematically analyze threat surfaces across intra-execution loops and interaction planes, formulate a multi-layered zero-trust defense-in-depth architecture integrating Dual-LLM isolation, Capability-Based Access Control, kernel eBPF probes, and sandboxed runtimes, and map technical controls to internatio...

Seyedakbar Mostafavi · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Sep 2026

Trustworthy Agentic AI: Failure Modes, Mitigation Strategies, and a Lifecycle Framework for Autonomous LLM Systems

Agentic AI systems built on large language models can plan over multiple steps, use external tools, retain information in memory, and coordinate with other agents. These capabilities make them more useful than static language models, but they also introduce new security and operational risks. Untrusted content from web...

Fayeq Jeelani Syed, Rehan Ahmad, Ali Al Bataineh et al. · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

TrustTwin: World-Model-Enhanced Twins for Trustworthy AIoT Decision Making

Recent advances in large language models are pushing IoT systems toward autonomous Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) paradigms, where system behavior depends on protocol semantics, internal state, interaction history, and environmental context. This creates a gap between AI-generated decisions and the behavior o...

Xiao-Yue Ma, Hua-Li Lu, Xiang-Xiang Dai et al. · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

Agentic AI for Autonomous Zero-Day Threat Detection in Zero-Trust Enterprise Security Architectures

Zero-day attacks exploit signature-based defenses since the key pieces of evidence used to identify attacks are not present during the training of the model. This paper proposes an Agentic Autonomous Zero-Trust (AAZT) framework that includes: Multimodal Open-set Detection, Evidence-grounded Multi-agent Investigation, C...

Anish Kumar Kodeboyina, Bhasker Chittanoori, Surya Raghavendra Kommisetti · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

SoK: When Safe Agents Fail Together: The Security of Multi Agent LLM Systems

This work systematizes MAS security through an execution-centered analysis of 197 works, introducing an A-I-R framework that organizes attacks by adversary position, interaction interface, and resulting system-level risk, unifying otherwise fragmented attack mechanisms across MAS.

Rui Yang, Jun-Jie Xu, Zheng-Yu Liu et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.