Skip to content

Interleaved Noise Injection Improves Clean, Corrupted, and OOD Performance

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.14466 · 0 citations · 39 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

It is shown that the effect of interleaved noise injection stems from penalizing the failure modes encouraged by the inductive bias of the models: impulse noise works against the locality bias of convolutional (ResNet) architectures, and Gaussian noise reduces the tendency of attention-based models to pick up large-scale spurious features.

Abstract

Noise injection is a well-known technique in stochastic optimization. We report its surprising effectiveness with an interleaved (on-off-on-off...) rather than the usual monotonic decay schedule. We present a theoretical analysis of noise injection, which confirms that corruption by impulse noise approximates a Jacobian regularization, whereas Gaussian noise acts as a curvature penalty. This regularization behavior has been invoked to explain why noise injection increases model robustness. But the interleaved nature of our proposed schedule produces superior results even for the optimization objective: mixing phases of noisy data permits the optimizer to escape local minima and increase exploration without the risk of catastrophically forgetting the important features from the clean data. To stabilize this training scheme against the rapid changes of the loss when switching between clean and noisy data, we introduce a gradient-norm stabilization technique that scales noisy updates based on clean gradient magnitudes. We compare this method with other common augmentation methods and find substantial improvements in corruption tolerance and robustness to real-world distribution shifts on CIFAR-100-C, ImageNet-C, and ImageNet-R for ResNet and ViT architectures, with the best results being achieved by stacking our method on top of other augmentations. Through saliency and attention maps we show that the effect of interleaved noise injection stems from penalizing the failure modes encouraged by the inductive bias of the models: impulse noise works against the locality bias of convolutional (ResNet) architectures, and Gaussian noise reduces the tendency of attention-based models to pick up large-scale spurious features. Interleaved noise injection is therefore an effective tool to improve the test performance on clean, noisy, and out-of-distribution data at essentially zero computational cost.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Sep 2026

One-Step Is Optimal: Unconditional Rectified Flows are Noise2Noise Denoisers, and Multi-Step Integration Provably Hurts---A Benchmark and Task-Based Detectability Study on Low-Dose CT

Iterative and generative denoisers are increasingly used under the assumption that multi-step refinement outperforms a single regression pass. We show the opposite for \emph{label-free} denoising. An \emph{unconditional} rectified flow trained on two noisy observations of the same signal, as in Noise2Noise, has a minim...

Timothy Sereda, Debesh Jha · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Jacobian-guided Noise Injection for Quantization Robustness in Large Language Models

This work proposes Jacobian-Guided Noise Injection, a training strategy that injects zero-mean Gaussian noise into pre-attention logits, with variance derived directly from the Jacobian Frobenius norm, which provides a way to identify the optimal noise variance based on the local attention sensitivity.

D. Pandey, Arnav Chavan, Nahush Lele et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Iterating Consistency Models: Stability, Error Bounds and Noise Schedules

Consistency models (CMs) have become a leading approach for generating high-quality samples in few steps. However, adding steps can improve or degrade sample quality in ways that are highly sensitive to the schedule and that existing theory does not fully explain. To provide accuracy guarantees and guide CM sampler des...

Alessio Spagnoletti, A. Haji-Ali, Andrés Almansa et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Noise2Noise Revisited: Training Pair Distributions Dominate Loss Choice in Self-Supervised Denoising

Noise2Noise (N2N) trains denoisers on pairs of independently corrupted observations, eliminating clean references. We stress-test two natural conjectures about why the L1 loss outperforms L2 here. First, the hypothesis that the L1 loss confers robustness via parameter sparsity confuses the loss with Lasso regularizatio...

Ding-Yan Shang, Zhen-Yu Xu, You Wang et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Spatially Adaptive Noise Injection

Experimental results and decoupling ablations demonstrate that SANI consistently improves Fr\'echet Inception Distance (FID) over the vanilla DDPM and DDIM endpoint samplers across diverse sampling timesteps, while remaining competitive with variance-learning baselines, highlighting the importance of spatial adaptivity...

Frantzeska Lavda, Maciej Falkiewicz, V. M. Nguyen et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.