This taxonomy reveals three broad patterns: inference-time approaches remain comparatively underexplored, related ideas have developed largely in isolation across pipeline stages, and externally grounded methods span the entire pipeline despite often being described under different terminology.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) encode rich concept-like information, but represent it implicitly through distributed statistical associations rather than as explicit, structured, compositional concepts. Consequently, concept-level structure is typically \emph{found} rather than \emph{designed}: it is recovered after training through probing or dictionary learning, with no architectural guarantee of stability, compositionality, controllability, or alignment with human conceptual organization. We organize concept-aware interventions along two dimensions: whether concept structure is internally induced or externally grounded, and the stage of the pipeline where it is introduced. This taxonomy reveals three broad patterns: inference-time approaches remain comparatively underexplored, related ideas have developed largely in isolation across pipeline stages, and externally grounded methods span the entire pipeline despite often being described under different terminology. Together, these observations motivate moving beyond recovering concept-like structure from trained models toward designing LLMs with explicit conceptual representations.
This tutorial presents a unified vision in which structuring serves as the enabling foundation for three pillars of next-generation LLM systems, highlighting how the cooperative interplay between classical KDD techniques and modern LLMs-where KDD defines structural schemas and quality constraints while LLMs execute fle...
Peng-Cheng Jiang, Jiashuo Sun, Wonbin Kweon et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
A layer-wise analysis indicates that surface-level features such as temporality and negation are captured more reliably than deeper semantic phenomena like quantification in large language models, highlighting the limited capacity of current LLMs to generate fully formal meaning representations.
Rémi De Vergnette, Maxime Amblard· International Conference on...· 0 citations
Steerling-8B remains competitive with open peer models trained on substantially 2-16x more compute, suggesting a different scaling paradigm: interpretability can be designed into training, and it improves with scale.
Guide Labs Team, Andreas Madsen, A. Ismail et al.· 3 citations· ⚡1
This work proposes GUIDER (Generative User Interest Discovery & Explicit Reasoning), a framework that fundamentally decouples intent planning from item matching by reformulating sequential modeling within a rigorous closed-set semantic interest space.
Jin-Ke Wu, Ying-Hao Wu, Shuchang Liu et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
Understanding information processing in large language models (LLMs) requires dissecting the geometric organization of their internal token representations. While existing mechanistic interpretability (MI) methods seek to extract concepts, they are constrained by a strong linearity assumption challenged by evidence of...
Tido Specht, Elias Krey, Nils Neukirch et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces DocHop, a benchmark for integrated chart--context reasoning in document-style images and constructs DocHop via a stochastic logic-first generation pipeline with controllable reasoning depth and visual density, to enable systematic evaluation.
Zhuoran Yu, Le Thien Phuc Nguyen, Jaden Park et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.