Skip to content

Backpropagation-Free Trunk Training via the Split Forward Gradients

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.16612 · 1 citation · 31 references
Mathematics Computer Science

TL;DR

Split Forward Gradient is introduced, which splits a network at an intermediate representation: it computes the output head gradient exactly and estimates only the trunk gradient with a Jacobian--vector product, which reduces estimator variance and requires no backward pass through the trunk, while retaining an Adam-style convergence guarantee.

Abstract

Backpropagation makes training deep networks memory intensive because it must store intermediate activations. Forward-mode methods avoid this cost, but their gradient estimates become increasingly noisy as the number of trained parameters grows. We introduce Split Forward Gradient (Split-FG), which splits a network at an intermediate representation: it computes the output head gradient exactly and estimates only the trunk gradient with a Jacobian--vector product. This reduces estimator variance and requires no backward pass through the trunk, while retaining an Adam-style convergence guarantee. Our experiments reveal an important practical failure mode. On WikiText-103, naive forward-gradient training of the trunk performs worse than leaving a randomly initialized trunk frozen, likely because Adam updates every noisy, under-determined trunk coordinate too aggressively. Simply using a much smaller learning rate for the trunk reverses this result: a $16$M-parameter GPT-2-style model reaches validation perplexity $387$, compared with $668$ for the frozen-trunk control and $2{,}885$ for a matched pure forward-gradient baseline (backpropagation reaches $150$). Split-FG also produces the strongest backprop-free results on our tabular benchmarks and reaches $60.5\%$ on CIFAR-10 and $35.2\%$ on CIFAR-100 with a heavy-head design. It reduces peak memory by up to $35\%$ relative to matched backpropagation, although the performance gap widens as the forward-mode trunk grows.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Probe-Space Preconditioning for Fast and Stable Zero-Order Training

Backpropagation (BP) dominates deep learning but imposes a massive memory tax. For example, training OPT-30B with Adam requires $\approx$ 600GB of GPU memory (assuming batch size 8 and sequence length 2048). Alternatively, zero-order optimization (ZOO) trains in inference-mode (requiring only $\approx$ 60GB for the sam...

Francois Chaubard, M. Kochenderfer, Chris Ré · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Double Descent in Gradient Boosting Decision Trees via Split-Candidate Scaling

Double descent is commonly studied by scaling an explicit capacity parameter, such as neural-network width. For gradient boosting decision trees (GBDTs), however, an analogous single-axis capacity parameter has not been established. We propose the number of split candidates as an operational capacity parameter for GBDT...

Ryuichi Kanoh · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

The Price of Locality: Why Forward-Forward Underperforms Backpropagation?

The Forward-Forward Algorithm (FFA) replaces backpropagation (BP) with layer-wise local contrastive objectives, eliminating the backward pass and the need to retain intermediate activations, yet suffers a persistent performance gap with BP that worsens with depth. This paper diagnoses two structural failure modes: an o...

Zhao-Xian Wu, Hai-Chuan Liu, Tian-Yi Chen · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Scaling Zero-Order Pretraining through Model Sharding

Zero-order optimization (ZO) trains without backpropagation, making it relevant to forward-only hardware and non-differentiable loss, but its gradient variance grows with perturbed dimension, inhibiting large-model training. Sharded Optimization Mixture of Assemblies (SOMA) trains LSTM experts independently on $N$ data...

Francois Chaubard, M. Kochenderfer, Chris Ré · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

The Ups and Downs of Backprop Weights

It is argued that functional parameter identifiability may provide an organizing principle for models that systematically reuse and recombine learned functions while adapting only the components that need to change.

G. Chindemi, Benjamin Grewe · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

LocalProp: Neuro-Localized Memory-Efficient Backpropagation

This work proposes LocalProp, a training procedure that locally updates the weights of a model, where the pre-training is based on I-JEPA, and empirically shows that it reaches good performance at a fraction of GPU peak memory.

Diana-Nicoleta Grigore, Iuliana Georgescu, R. Ionescu · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.