Collaborative Decision-Making in Human-AI Versus Human-Human Teams: The Influence of Information Inquiry and Team Performance Expectations on Team Processes and Outcomes.
Sep 2026· Human Factors· pp.
187208261477411
· 0 citations· 78 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This study investigates whether decision-making processes in human-AI teams mirror those in human-only teams in a task where team members hold common and unique information and demonstrates how established decision-making paradigms can be adapted to incorporate AI.
Abstract
ObjectiveWe investigate whether decision-making processes in human-AI teams mirror those in human-only teams in a task where team members hold common and unique information. Specifically, we examine how information inquiry and performance expectations influence these processes.BackgroundHuman-AI decision-making has traditionally been studied as a linear, segmented process where AI provides recommendations and humans make final decisions. However, recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) enable increasingly dynamic interactions similar to the collaborative processes in human-only teams, where members have to share and integrate unique information to reach decisions. Despite the potential for similar dynamics in human-AI teams, research on such configurations-particularly on when unique information is shared-remains limited.MethodWe conducted an experiment using a hidden profile task, a well-established paradigm in team research. We manipulated team type (Nhuman-AI = 98; Nhuman-only = 65, three-member teams) and information inquiry, and created conditions with differing performance expectations.ResultsInformation inquiry enhanced information sharing and, consequently, improved decision-making performance, irrespective of performance expectations and team type. Exploratory analyses suggested that while this effect was consistent across team types, information inquiry patterns may differ.ConclusionOur findings prompt avenues for future research on how humans' communication norms vary when interacting with AI versus human team members. Methodologically, this study demonstrates how established decision-making paradigms can be adapted to incorporate AI, offering insights into both human-only and human-AI team processes.ApplicationThe results have practical implications for designing AI systems that promote effective team decision-making by engaging in information inquiry.
Transparency may improve coordination efficiency without affecting trust or team effectiveness in newly formed Human–AI teams, suggesting transparency may improve coordination efficiency without affecting trust or team effectiveness.
Spencer S. Onstot, Eric T. Greenlee, Gregory J. Funke et al.· Proceedings of the Human Fac...· 0 citations
This study explores the impact of designing AI teammates to support teamwork processes in Human-AI Teams (HATs), comparing reactive and proactive support’s influence on teamwork experiences. HATs achieve shared objectives through taskwork and teamwork processes. Teamwork processes between humans are well documented, su...
Yvonne A. Farah, Michael C. Dorneich· Proceedings of the Human Fac...· 0 citations
As AI becomes increasingly adept at communicating with humans in natural language and complementing human skills in various collaborative and teamwork settings, how the CSCW community understands the evolving role of communication in human-AI teams (HATs) urgently needs to keep pace with these technological advancement...
Wen Duan, Rui Zhang, Nan Weng et al.· Proceedings of the ACM on Hu...· 0 citations
The eight contributions examine how design choices such as human‐likeness and gendered cues shape perceptions of AI, how AI alters team processes including decision‐making, trust, and stress, and how training and organizational integration condition sustainable human–AI collaboration.
Anna‐Sophie Ulfert, Eleni Georganta, G. Grote· Journal of Organizational Be...· 2 citations
The spread of agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems that can autonomously plan, use tools, and perform multi-step tasks instead of offering single recommendations challenges long-held views on where managerial authority lies within organisations. Using a PRISMA-guided search across databases like Scopus, Web of...
Dasaradha Arangi, Sreemanthula Jhansi, Minhaz Husain et al.· Journal of Progress in Artif...· 0 citations
This work examines how six decision-support mechanisms affect engagement, trust, and collaborative task performance in a diabetes meal-planning scenario and argues for a contextual, balanced pairing of CFF and XAI design that accounts for interactivity, decision frequency, and task complexity.
Oliver Henderson· International Journal of Com...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.