We prove that the realization graph of every graphical degree sequence is maximally Hamiltonian: it is Hamilton-laceable when bipartite on more than one vertex, and Hamilton-connected otherwise. This answers Problem P59 of M\"utze's survey of combinatorial Gray codes, and the Hamiltonicity question recorded as open by Barrus, in the strongest form either admits. The argument is an induction on the number of ground vertices, cutting the realization graph at a single ground vertex into fibers and the quotient they lie over. The proof is formalized in Lean 4 and checked by its kernel, with seven results cited from the literature and nothing else assumed. Its engine is a classification. The realizable neighborhoods of a ground vertex form a shifted family -- one closed under replacing an element by a smaller one -- and the quotient is the Johnson graph of that family. Such a Johnson graph can fail to be Hamilton-connected, and we determine exactly when: the failures are one explicit family of examples, the Y-families, and each of them fails between a single pair of its members. A shifted family with a greatest member never fails, and those families are exactly the shifted matroids, where the conclusion already follows from the theorem of Naddef and Pulleyblank on the graphs of 0/1-polytopes. The obstruction lives entirely outside the matroid case, which is why it has not been met before.
A graph is integral if the spectrum of its adjacency matrix consists entirely of integers. We prove that every simple graph having a pendant path with at least three edges has an eigenvalue in $(1,2\cos(\pi/9)]$ and one in $[-2\cos(\pi/9),-1)$, and hence is not integral. This settles a conjecture of Braga, Del-Vecchio...
R. O. Braga, Jean Carlo Moraes, Matheus C. Santos· 0 citations
We prove that a path maximizes the expected range of a uniformly chosen graph homomorphism into the integers, with one vertex pinned at zero, among all connected bipartite graphs of the same order. This establishes the expectation form of the Benjamini--H\"aggstr\"om--Mossel conjecture. The proof restricts and rescales...
A finite simple graph $G$ is called a cograph if it does not contain the path on four vertices $P_4$ as an induced subgraph. It is classically known that the family of cographs are well-quasi-ordered by the induced subgraph relation \cite{D}. In preceding work of Knudsen and the third author \cite[Theorem 7.2]{KR}, it...
Adityo Mamun, Jonathan Nalikka, Eric Ramos· 0 citations
The representation number of a graph is the least positive integer $k$ for which its vertices can be arranged in a word, each occurring $k$ times, so that two distinct letters alternate precisely when the corresponding vertices are adjacent. We prove that every bipartite graph on $N\ge9$ vertices has representation num...
Matthew J. Colbrook, Catherine Drysdale· 0 citations
For a fixed graph F, the F-degree of a vertex v in a host graph H is the number of subgraphs of H isomorphic to F that contain v, and H is F-irregular if its F-degrees are pairwise distinct. We show that every finite connected graph F on at least three vertices admits a finite connected F-irregular host. For noncomplet...
A graph on \(n\) vertices is called a Parter graph if there exists a nonsingular symmetric matrix, whose nonzero off-diagonal entries correspond exactly to the edges of the graph, such that all of its principal submatrices of order \(n-1\) are singular. Previously, a graph satisfying this condition was said to have pro...
G. Arunkumar, Puja Samanta· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.