Jul 2026· The Korea Association of Yeolin Education· Vol 34, pp. 887-915· 0 citations
TL;DR
The Learning Competency Diagnostic Test (H-LCT(II) developed in this study is expected to be useful for diagnosing university students’ AI-era learning competencies and for establishing educational interventions and policy support at the university level.
Abstract
This study aimed to validate the practical components of learning competency by reflecting changes in the university learning environment resulting from the recent expansion of digital environments and artificial intelligence (AI). To achieve this purpose, preliminary items consisting of three dimensions—learning cognition, learning skills, and learning attitudes—and nine subdomains, including items measuring AI-integrated learning performance, were developed and their content validity was confirmed through an expert Delphi survey. The preliminary version of the Learning Competency Diagnostic Test (H-LCT(II)) was administered to 258 undergraduate students at H University. The collected data was analyzed through exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), construct validity verification, and competitive model comparisons to establish the validity of the instrument from multiple perspectives. The results indicated that the nine subdomains formed a bifactor hierarchical structure consisting of a learning dimension and an AI-utilization dimension, and the validity of the structure was empirically supported at multiple levels. In addition, the reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity at the latent construct level all satisfied the recommended criteria. Consequently, a final measurement model consisting of 41 items across the learning and AI-utilization dimensions was confirmed. The Learning Competency Diagnostic Test (H-LCT(II)) developed in this study is expected to be useful for diagnosing university students’ AI-era learning competencies and for establishing educational interventions and policy support at the university level.
The purpose of this study was to determine the content validity of a scale designed to evaluate the use of artificial intelligence in university learning (EPIA-U). The instrument consists of 28 items distributed across four dimensions—Academic support, Study personalization, Satisfaction with use, and Perceived depende...
José Luis Girarte-Guillén, O. A. Flores-Laguna· Apertura· 0 citations
The results revealed statistically significant improvements between pre- and post-test scores, suggesting the potential effectiveness of the program within this exploratory pilot context, and recommends incorporating artificial intelligence-based teaching strategies in university education to enhance students’ producti...
H. AlMuhaysh· Frontiers in Psychology· 0 citations
This study examines the pedagogical integration of educommunication and artificial intelligence (AI) and its association with self-reported professional competencies among university prosumers-students who simultaneously consume, produce, and share academic content through digital platforms.
A non-experime...
Cesar Miguel Andrade-Martinez, Johan Manuel Méndez Reyes· Frontiers in Education· 0 citations
This study examined the extent of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-aided learning and its relationship with the academic performance of Junior High School students at Sirawai National High School during School Year 2024–2025. Anchored in Cognitive Load Theory, Social Cultural Theory, and the Technology Acceptance Model, th...
Aisa A. Wahid· International Journal of Sus...· 0 citations
This study primarily aimed to develop and validate the Universal Competency Assessment Tool (UCAT) as an assessment instrument aligned with the Education and Training Quality Authority’s (BQA) 21st-century skills framework. Using data from 623 undergraduate teacher-education students at Bahrain Teachers College, UCAT’s...
Fatima Al Malki, A. Al-Hattami· International journal of res...· 0 citations
Traditional frameworks evaluating the university academic experience often give limited attention to students’ reported use of Artificial Intelligence. This study psychometrically validates a novel measurement model, testing whether AI-related academic practices emerge as a distinct component of students’ perceived aca...
Pamela Córdova, Alberto Grájeda, Vivian Verduguez· Education sciences· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.