Skip to content

Health artificial intelligence is here, but are we measuring what matters?

Sep 2026 · JAMIA Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

Limits in prevailing approaches to health AI evaluation are examined and a framework prioritizing outcomes-based, systems-level assessment aligned with healthcare delivery goals is proposed, contrasting a deontological focus on methodological standards with a consequentialist framework emphasizing real-world impact.

View source

Similar papers

Sep 2026

[Accuracy alone is not enough: cognitive safety of artificial intelligence in medicine.]

Cognitive safety is proposed here as a longitudinal property of the clinician-AI-organization sociotechnical system: its capacity to support or improve clinical performance without eroding independent hypothesis generation, uncertainty calibration, reasoned dissent, metacognitive control, and resilient performance when...

S. Corrao · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Toward a Framework for Assessing Patient-Facing Gen AI Tools in Mental Healthcare.

BACKGROUND Generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) is becoming increasingly used in mental healthcare. While these systems offer scalable, human-like interactions, concerns persist regarding safety, clinical validity, and the absence of systematic assessment frameworks. OBJECTIVES This study systematically review...

Polina Durneva, Hedieh Ghorbanie · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

From Algorithmic Performance to Hospital Value: A Narrative Review of Clinical Artificial Intelligence

This narrative review synthesizes evidence on clinical AI methods, applications, implementation, evaluation, evaluation, and sustainability in hospitals and proposes institutional efficacy as the warranted and revisable hospital-level judgment that an AI-enabled service configuration can generate and sustain patient-ce...

Christina Morfaki · 1 citation

EDITORIAL TEAM

The study found that existing health and medical practice regulations remain oriented toward conventional healthcare relationships, and shared liability as a legal construction for distributing responsibility in AI-related healthcare malpractice is found to be inadequate.

Mochammad Tanzil Multazam, Hindarto, Yusuf Handyliem et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

When is AI “just another innovation”? A comparative conceptual analysis of artificial intelligence and evidence-based practice implementation

This analysis suggests that, across CFIR domains, adaptive and generative AI systems foreground issues such as opacity, probabilistic outputs, dependence on local data ecosystems, performance drift, vendor-mediated updating, regulatory uncertainty, professional identity tensions and the need for calibrated trust.

Per Nilsen, Kathrine Hald, M. Neher · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.