Skip to content
Book Open access

The Relevance of (Relevant) Entity Presence

Jul 2026 · Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · pp. 2835-2844 · 1 citation · 19 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

It is concluded that knowing the relevance of entities for an information need can be very valuable, but that the methods described are insufficient to determine this relevance information from the documents and queries alone.

Abstract

Query-Specific Document and Entity Representations (QDER) has shown state-of-the-art effectiveness on multiple information retrieval benchmarks. This work attempts to reproduce this promising approach. In an initial attempt, we were unable to find results that resemble the convincing effects measured in the original work. A deep dive into the published artifacts, plus a comparative study of similar work by the same authors show inconsistencies between the descriptions in the paper and their implementation in the published artifacts, and a leakage of relevance assessments due to oversampling entities that are known to appear in relevant documents only. Due to dependencies in the ranking pipeline upon relevance assessments, the final ranking models gain knowledge about the relevance of entities. We conclude that knowing the relevance of entities for an information need can be very valuable, but that the methods described are insufficient to determine this relevance information from the documents and queries alone. The resulting pipeline cannot be deployed effectively in practice, limiting the impact of the research results.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Robustness of IR Models to Collection Growth

This study empirically evaluates the robustness of an IR model to the addition of non-relevant documents by merging two collections with negligible topic overlap and finds that MDA is more effective than MDD for retrieval, whereas MDD and MDA rerankers are equally effective.

Emmanouil Georgios Lionis, Sean MacAvaney, Debasis Ganguly · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Can Retrievers Find the Same Paper from Different Aspects? A Multi-Aspect Full-Paper Scientific Retrieval Benchmark

An expert-validated benchmark for multi-aspect, full-paper retrieval that evaluates whether retrievers can consistently recover the same paper from queries targeting its motivation, method, and experimental findings, and proposes MAPLE-Synth, a retrieval-based in-context learning pipeline that leverages OpenReview disc...

Yiyang Wei, Fang Guo, Qiji Zhou et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Think Before You Link: Rarity, Reasoning, and Retrieval in Multilingual Entity Linking

A simple, training-free framework in which a reasoning-capable vision-language model iteratively searches and reasons over Wikipedia, gathering evidence dynamically, shows that reasoning and retrieval are complementary on rare entities.

Parinthapat Pengpun, Simran Khanuja, Graham Neubig · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

A Systematic Multi-Domain Evaluation of Document Retrievers

Document retrieval is a crucial component of many modern AI systems, directly influencing their effectiveness, robustness, and fairness in downstream tasks. While recent years have seen a growing number of retrievers, comparative studies in the literature are typically limited in scope or focused on singular benchmarks...

Valentin Velev, Andreas Spitz · 0 citations

: Breaking the Top-k

Khaled Albishre · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.