Peri-Implant Tissue Stability Following Guided Bone Regeneration With Bioceramic: A Multicenter One-Year Cohort Study.
TL;DR
GBR with bioceramic demonstrated stable radiographical bone on the buccal side of the implant 1 year after crown delivery, and implant survival rate was 100% in both groups.
Abstract
Objectives
This multicenter prospective cohort study follows a 1-year period after a previously published randomized controlled trial, comparing the radiographic and clinical outcomes of implants placed with simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) using bioceramic (BC) versus xenograft (BO).
Materials And Methods
Patients from the previous trial were recalled 1 year after crown delivery. The follow-up data focused on the buccal bone stability evaluated by CBCT and implant survival rate, Probing Depth (PD), Bleeding on Probing (BOP), Plaque Index (PI), and patient satisfaction through Oral Health Impact Profile-5 (OHIP-5).
Results
Out of 150 enrolled patients in a previous trial, a total of 97 patients completed the 1-year follow-up: 44 in the BC group and 53 in the BO group. The implant survival rate was 100% in both groups. Change in horizontal buccal bone thickness (△HBBT) at 1 year post-crown delivery versus immediately post-surgery was -0.28 ± 0.10 mm for the BC group and -0.91 ± 0.09 mm (mean ± standard error) for the BO group, with the BC group exhibiting less bone resorption along the implant than the BO group (p = 0.0000). No significant differences were observed in PI, BOP, or PD. Patient satisfaction remained high in both groups.
Conclusions
GBR with bioceramic demonstrated stable radiographical bone on the buccal side of the implant 1 year after crown delivery.