A deterministic O(1)-competitive algorithm that allocates k replica GPUs among m experts as workloads change and is machine-checked in Lean 4 relative to the positive-body result as the sole scientific source premise.
Abstract
Dynamic Mixture-of-Experts Serving allocates k replica GPUs among m experts as workloads change. At each round, the online algorithm sees the current workload, chooses integral replica counts, and pays bottleneck service cost plus replica movement. It does not know future workloads. Huang, Lou, and Xiao gave an O(sqrt(log k))-competitive randomized algorithm for this problem. We prove a deterministic O(1)-competitive algorithm. For every number of experts and every k>=1, the algorithm satisfies ALG_det<= 10 C_PB OPT + (5 C_PB + 8) k + 16, where C_PB is the absolute constant from Chasing Positive Bodies at resource augmentation one and covering sparsity two. Consequently, CR_det(k)<=10 C_PB for every k>=1, so CR_det(k)=Theta(1). The multiplicative factor does not depend on the number of experts, replica budget, horizon, or workload values. Thus randomization is not needed for the asymptotic guarantee. The proof has two layers. A finite tangent envelope, summable positive resets, and a nonexpansive balanced projection reduce reciprocal-max service costs to a deterministic exact-budget fractional path. A new deterministic rounding theorem converts every such path to integral allocations with service distortion three and movement bounded by the fractional movement plus 6k. The complete reduction, rounding theorem, causal composition, and quantified main theorem are machine-checked in Lean 4 relative to the positive-body result as the sole scientific source premise. The theorem concerns the allocation model above. It does not include network topology, shared-edge congestion, or routing decisions.
A fully online model for batching nonpreemptive LLM requests under a growing KV-cache memory constraint and it is proved that every deterministic algorithm has competitive ratio Omega(sqrt(n), while the elementary sequential upper bound is n.
This work formalizes per-batch dispatch as a fixed-charge makespan problem---NP-hard on two fully replicated GPUs, polynomial in degenerate limits---and presents TEMPO, a makespan-aware dispatcher solving it in milliseconds off the critical path; its SGLang integration runs out-of-process and fuses dispatch with count...
Jie Li, Chen-Xin Jia, Jinliang Shen et al.· 1 citation
The extreme collective completion time (CCT) demands of AI workloads challenge existing packet spraying algorithms, which can have trouble efficiently load-balancing workloads that are sent at full line rates. We trace this to a structural cause: on a fat tree, once a packet picks its upward path, the downward path to...
Sarah McClure, E. Cohen, Jakob Krebs et al.· 0 citations
SIF is introduced, a metric built on the notion of partial-nodes that is independent of historical workload knowledge that matches both theory and production and COMPASS-ABS is proposed, which employs the COMPact-ASSured (COMPASS) algorithm to confine the cluster state within a tight Anchor-Based Space (ABS).
Marginal-contribution pricing makes the social objective an exact potential, but does not ensure that every stable assignment is efficient. We study indivisible clients with heterogeneous workloads, arbitrary nonnegative assignment costs, and private eligibility menus over a fixed number of shared servers and optional...
Hao Li, Meng-Fan Ma· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.