The compose-and-compress technique is introduced, which deletes the expensive middle layers of these products and replaces paths across the deleted bands with sound one-symbol shortcut transitions.
Abstract
For integers $k\le n$, let $L_{k,n}$ be the set of words over $[n]$ of length at most $k$ in which no symbol is repeated. We present a nondeterministic finite automaton (NFA) of size $3.918^k n^{O(1)}$, improving on the $4^{k+o(k)}n^{O(1)}$ construction of Ben-Basat, Gabizon, and Zehavi. Our proof organizes several classical ingredients---product automata, hashing, and coefficient estimates---into a gadget-amplification framework: We take the product of many copies of a small local NFA gadget, whose language is a subset of $L_{r,c}$, and hash the $k$ input symbols to copies and local colors. The hash family guarantees that, for every repetition-free input, some hash sends at most $r$ symbols to each copy such that the resulting projection in every copy is accepted by the local gadget. Taking the nondeterministic union of the corresponding product NFAs yields a global NFA. Amplifying a $200$-state gadget for $L_{6,11}$ obtained from the small Witt design $S(4,5,11)$, this framework gives a $3.967^k n^{O(1)}$-size NFA. We then introduce the compose-and-compress technique, which deletes the expensive middle layers of these products and replaces paths across the deleted bands with sound one-symbol shortcut transitions. We apply it twice, once for enhancing the amplification framework and again for the local gadget, obtaining the stated result.
Let $d$ be the divisor function, and let $K(n)$ be the least positive integer $K$ for which $d((n + K)!) \ge 2d(n!)$. Erd\H{o}s, Graham, Ivi\'c and Pomerance proved that, for infinitely many $n$, \begin{equation*} K(n)>(1/9)(\log n)(\log_{2} n)(\log_{4} n)/(\log_{3} n)^3. \end{equation*} We improve upon this by a facto...
For integers $d\geq 3$, let $F_{2,d}(n)$ be the largest size of a subset of $[n]$ containing no two distinct elements whose product is a perfect $d$-th power, and let $f_{2,d}(n)$ denote the analogous quantity when the two elements need not be distinct. Fleiner, Juh\'asz, K\"ov\'er, Pach, and S\'andor proved that both...
The Ramsey number $r_k(s,n)$ is the smallest integer $N$ such that every $N$-vertex $k$-graph contains either a copy of $K_s^{(k)}$ or an independent set of size $n$. Erd\H{o}s and Hajnal conjectured that for every fixed $s>k\ge 4$, one has $r_k(s,n)\ge \operatorname{twr}_{k-1}(\Omega(n))$. This conjecture was independ...
Long-Ma Du, Xin-Yu Hu, Rui-Long Liu et al.· 0 citations
For practical $N$ let $h(N)$ be the least $k$ such that every integer $1\le m\le N$ is a sum of at most $k$ distinct divisors of $N$. We prove $h(n!)\le(2\log2+o(1))\,n/\log n$. This improves the bounds of order $n/(\log n)^{1/2-\varepsilon}$ established in Tenenbaum-Yokota's Lemma 4 and Yokota's 1995 knapsack note. We...
For a given number $N$, we consider the problem of computing two integers $1\leq r,f<N$ such that the set $$\mathcal{X}(N,r,f) = \{(a+b)-(f+\frac{Nr+1}{f}): ab=Nr\}$$ consists only of positive integers. Computing a solution to the problem is equivalent to finding a pair $(r,f)$ satisfying $l(Nr)<f \leq l(Nr+1)$, where...
We show that optimally pseudorandom $K_4$-free graphs of order $n$ and degree $d = \Theta(n^{4/5})$ exist by constructing a graph in the split Cayley hexagon, matching the known upper bound. This resolves the first open case for $K_k$-free graphs after $k=3$ for which Alon gave a tight construction in 1994. This has a...
Jie Han, F. Ihringer, H. Van Maldeghem· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.