In this study, we examined whether current 3D reconstruction methods can support the creation of realistic holographic representations of laboratory objects for educational use. In this regard, we compared four approaches: photogrammetry, a neural radiance field (NeRF)-based method, Gaussian splatting, and LiDAR. These methods were used to generate holographic models of common laboratory items and their fidelity was evaluated by graduate students. Participants assessed the models for shape, color, texture, and visual defects using a repeated-measures design. Across objects, the NeRF-based method produced the most consistently high-fidelity representations, particularly for transparent, reflective, or low-texture items that were difficult to capture with other approaches. Shape and color were generally reproduced more successfully than texture, suggesting that some visual properties remain more challenging to represent accurately in educational holograms. Beyond identifying the strengths and limitations of each reconstruction method, the study demonstrates a practical workflow for creating immersive learning objects that may support pre-laboratory preparation, spatial reasoning, and student engagement in AR/MR-based educational environments. These findings offer design-relevant insights for educators and researchers developing immersive digital learning experiences.
Bryan De La Cruz, Aaron Y. Zhao, Maitrey Gramopadhye et al.· 0 citations
Robot manipulation policies are improving quickly, and real-robot evaluation remains the standard evidence for that progress. It still relies on a human to reset the scene between rollouts, which consumes operator time and leaves the initial state distribution unspecified, so results reproduce poorly. A recent system, AutoEval, automates both reset and scoring, but only for single-step tasks, because a long-horizon rollout can terminate in combinatorially many configurations that no single learned reset policy covers. We present HALTER, a Harness for Autonomous Long-horizon Task Evaluation and Reset, which restores the scene by planning over a library of learned atomic reset skills, so demonstration cost scales with the size of that library rather than with the number of terminal states. HALTER builds a spatial scene graph online from point clouds and vision foundation models, and an LLM reasons over this graph to score the rollout, plan the reset, and verify that the reset succeeded, without collecting labeled success images for any task. On four long-horizon tasks on a Franka arm, HALTER restores the scene in 76% of episodes, against 52% for AutoEval and 65% for a motion-planning reset, and it estimates the completed-skill fraction correctly in 90% of episodes, against 76%. Its reset-verification verdict is correct in 91% of episodes, compared with 78% for AutoEval. It also cuts the operator time of an evaluation campaign by 72% relative to manual reset. We further measure compositional generalization on three held-out tasks, where HALTER resets 74.7% of episodes against 1.3% for a per-task reset policy, and we ablate the scene representation and the graph update rate.
Jing Jiang, Yue Yang, Xin-Kai Jiang et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
