Skip to content

Author

E. Ocansey

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Review Open access Jul 2026

Influence of Risk on Procurement in Public Institutions in Africa

Purpose: This study examined the influence of risk on procurement in public institutions in Africa through a systematic meta-analysis of over 70 peer-reviewed and grey literature sources published between 2000 and 2025. Methodology: The research synthesized both quantitative and qualitative evidence to identify dominant procurement risks, assess their effect sizes, and evaluate heterogeneity across countries. Findings: The analysis revealed that corruption risks exert the strongest influence on procurement outcomes, with a pooled effect size of r = 0.62. Corruption manifested in bid rigging, inflated pricing, favoritism, and political patronage, eroding trust and inflating costs. Contract management risks (r = 0.55) and governance risks (r = 0.52) also emerged as significant, reflecting challenges in contract enforcement, monitoring, accountability, and political interference. Operational risks (r = 0.48), such as delays and supply chain inefficiencies, and technological risks (r = 0.41), linked to e-procurement adoption, were found to be moderately influential but increasingly relevant. Heterogeneity analysis demonstrated that procurement risks vary contextually: South Africa’s risks were tied to elite capture within strong legal systems, Ghana and Tanzania struggled with weak enforcement, and Nigeria faced diffuse governance-related risks. Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: This study integrates agency, principal–agent, institutional, governance, and risk management theories into one analytical lens, empirically quantifying and ranking procurement risks by effect size while theorizing their interdependence as a systemic, self-reinforcing phenomenon adapted to African contexts. For policy, it offers an evidence-based hierarchy for sequencing reform and supports context-sensitive, integrated interventions over one-size-fits-all fixes. For practice, it highlights layered preventive, detective, and corrective controls, stronger contract oversight, capacity-building, and carefully managed e-procurement adoption. Collectively, it reframes procurement risk reduction as a developmental imperative central to transparency, accountability, and sustainable development across the continent.

E. Ackom, E. Ocansey · 0 citations