While LLM attacks span prompt optimization, multi-turn context manipulation, retrieval poisoning, and model backdoors, white-box defenses are typically evaluated on isolated attack families. Consequently, whether heterogeneous attacks leave internal representation shifts that generalize to unseen threat mechanisms remains unknown. We present MechAudit-40, a systematic evaluation of 40 attack mechanisms across five open-weight model architectures. Threat-specific success criteria, 100,000 matched clean-attack representation pairs, predefined categories, and grouped holdouts isolate genuine attack-induced displacement from target scale, corpus bias, and data-leakage shortcuts. Across this testbed, attacks induce structured multi-depth trajectories rather than isolated layer spikes. While raw peaks are non-portable across architectures, target-calibrated profiles preserve transferable geometric signatures: under complete mechanism holdout, hidden states alone recover the threat category of unseen attacks with 82.5% accuracy. Guided by this finding, we design MechAudit, a runtime auditor that operates under strict zero-oracle constraints without requiring clean baseline traces or attack metadata. MechAudit detects 81.1% of held-out attack executions at a 0.70% false-positive rate and maintains 78.1% recall when an entire functional category is withheld. In matched comparisons, MechAudit is the only detector that avoids mechanism-level coverage collapse, maintaining over 50% recall across all 40 mechanisms. Internal representations thus support cross-mechanism attack-exposure auditing against calibrated benign references, but decouple from downstream task compromise and parameter integrity.
Zhen Guo, Shang-Hao Shi, Shamim Yazdani et al.· 0 citations
Agentic AI systems execute complex tasks through long-horizon workflows of planning, tool use, and multi-agent coordination. Task failures in these systems often originate from a single step, such as an injected prompt or a flawed plan, and are then amplified through downstream dependencies as the corrupted step propagates across many subsequent agents and tool calls. Existing defenses either target a specific class of attacks or failures, or inspect individual prompts and steps in isolation. Both leave the global dependency structure of a workflow unexamined, and miss the inconsistencies that only emerge when the execution is viewed as a whole. We argue that anomaly detection for agentic AI must reason at the workflow level, where global execution structure exposes signals that local checks cannot see. We present Skynet, a principled workflow-level anomaly detection framework that turns observed multi-agent execution into directed workflow graphs and scores them against learned benign behavior. Skynet jointly models the semantic execution context and the structural organization of inter-agent delegation, tool invocation, and data-flow dependencies, and trains only on benign workflows. Because training never sees attacks or failures, this design naturally extends to zero-day detection: any execution that violates benign workflow regularities surfaces as off-manifold geometry under a single decision rule. We evaluate Skynet on three public agentic safety and failure benchmarks. It sustains high recall together with a sub-1% false positive rate, with per-workflow and per-step latencies low enough for online monitoring of agentic AI runtimes.
Chaoyu Zhang, He-Xuan Yu, Heng Jin et al.· 0 citations
Indirect prompt injection (IPI) plants instructions in the content a tool-using LLM agent reads, steering the agent into harmful tool calls. The strongest defenses are system-level, leveraging techniques such as task-conditional tool screening to prevent execution of malicious tools, and information-flow control to avoid tool execution with untrusted parameters. However, as agents grow more capable, users delegate more to automation. Consequently, tool execution sequences and parameter values are increasingly determined at runtime and cannot be reliably screened from solely user's query without significant utility loss. We present ROPE (Routed Origin Policy Enforcement), which is anchored in a structural notion of trust: a value may reach a state-changing tool only if it traces unforgeably to the user, a source the user explicitly named, or the user's own authoritative records. Enforcement is then a deterministic origin check over an audited set of sensitive tool parameters, and the only reliance on a language model involves solely the trusted user request, out of the attacker's reach. Our approach admits two provable guarantees: 1) at every step of a trajectory, no value whose only origin is attacker-writable content reaches an origin-guarded parameter, and 2) no rewording of an injection changes an admission decision. We evaluate across four agent models on open-ended agent suites, ROPE holds attack success rate to 1.6--2.6\% while retaining 82--100\% of undefended clean utility, significantly exceeding state-of-the-art system-level defenses in utility while attaining comparable or better security. Further, we show that optimizing the injection against ROPE is largely ineffective, while long-horizon attacks that defeat prior system-level defenses achieve zero success rate. Our code and logs are available at https://github.com/xhOwenMa/ROPE .
Xinhang Ma, Chaowei Xiao, William Yeoh et al.· 1 citation
TokenPilot is presented, a dual-granularity context management framework that reduces costs by 61% and 56% in isolated mode, and 61% and 87% in continuous mode, while maintaining competitive performance compared to prior systems.
Buqiang Xu, Z. Xue, Dian Chen et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
