Skip to content

Author

R. P. Guillerman

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Review Open access Aug 2026

Evaluation of a novel flexible, lightweight blanket-like torso coil in pediatric MRI at 1.5-T - initial experience.

BACKGROUND Conventional phased-array torso coils used for abdominal MRI are relatively heavy and inflexible, potentially affecting patient comfort and technologist workflow. OBJECTIVE To compare image quality, patient experience, and technologist experience using a recently United States Food and Drug Administration-cleared flexible, lightweight, blanket-like torso coil versus a conventional torso coil for pediatric abdominal MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this prospective institutional review board-approved study, 20 pediatric patients (7 years-old to 18 years-old) undergoing routine clinical outpatient abdominal MRI were imaged on the same 1.5-T system using both a conventional torso coil and a flexible blanket-like torso coil (Smart Fit TorsoCardiac; Philips Healthcare). After standard clinical imaging, selected sequences were repeated following coil exchange. Five pediatric radiologists independently evaluated paired image sets for subjective signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and coil-related artifacts. Objective image quality was assessed using organ- and tissue-based SNR estimates and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements. Patients and MRI technologists completed questionnaires regarding comfort, usability, and examination experience. RESULTS All 20 patients (median age, 15 years; 55% female) underwent imaging with both coils. Radiologists rated the novel coil as similar to the conventional coil for subjective SNR across all three sequences under study; coil-related artifacts were uncommon (2% of assessments for all sequences evaluated). Objective analysis showed no significant image-based SNR differences for most sequences, although the flexible coil demonstrated higher liver SNR on axial diffusion-weighted imaging (adjusted P=0.01). CNR did not differ between coils. Patients reported greater comfort and less anxiety with the flexible coil; 55% preferred it for future MRI examinations versus 20% for the conventional coil. Technologists also favored the flexible coil, with 70% expressing an overall preference. CONCLUSION The flexible blanket-like torso coil provided image quality similar to a conventional coil and was generally preferred by patients and MRI technologists.

J. Dillman, Jean A. Tkach, R. P. Guillerman et al. · 0 citations