Leadership assessment often privileges self-perception or superior appraisal, even though executive conduct is experienced differently by peers, employees, clients, partners and institutional stakeholders. This paper develops a 360-degree audit architecture for evidence-based executive maturity assessment using the Total Leadership Index (TLI). Unlike conventional multi-source feedback, the proposed architecture does not treat ratings as interchangeable opinions. It preserves source visibility, links scores to observable behaviour and documentary evidence, assigns a separate evidence-confidence grade, fixes role-sensitive weights before data collection, and embeds confidentiality, consent, non-retaliation, calibration and due-process controls. The study follows a conceptual-methodological framework-development approach and integrates literature on multi-source feedback, self-other agreement, performance assessment, sustainable leadership, organizational resilience and succession governance. The resulting model specifies five rater categories, a standard 25-20-25-20-10 weighting structure, source-specific evidence standards, moderation rules, red-flag handling and an implementation cycle for corporations, SMEs, entrepreneurial ventures, project organizations and public institutions. The paper’s principal contribution is to reframe 360-degree feedback from a developmental survey into a governed audit of executive impact across four maturity domains: decision stillness, temporal precision, structured reflection and governed speech. The architecture is positioned as a mechanism for strengthening leadership succession, resilient execution, stakeholder trust and long-term organizational sustainability. Because the model is conceptual, no empirical effectiveness claims are made; a staged validation agenda is proposed for psychometric testing, inter-rater reliability, fairness, predictive validity and longitudinal development outcomes.
Alok Kumar Bhargava, Sonali Sneha· Journal of Asia Entrepreneur...· 0 citations
Organizations measure financial results, operational performance, safety, project delivery and compliance with considerable precision, yet the leadership conduct shaping those outcomes is often governed through reputation, seniority, charisma or self-description. This conceptual synthesis develops an integrated governance architecture for measuring, auditing, visualizing, developing and institutionalizing conscious leadership through the Total Leadership Index (TLI). It positions the TLI alongside transformational, authentic, ethical, servant and leadership-capital traditions while defining a distinct contribution: an evidence-governed architecture for observable conduct under pressure. At its centre is a proposed 100-point executive maturity construct comprising four equally weighted pillars—Decision Stillness; Timing and Sequence Discipline; Structured Reflection and Root-Cause Honesty; and Governed Speech with Institutional Consequence—linked to protected 360-degree evidence, behavioural rubrics, evidence-confidence ratings, non-compensatory red flags, ethical dashboards, simulation-based development, conditional certification and institutional renewal. The framework is not presented as a validated personality test, popularity ranking or automated decision engine. Its empirical programme specifies expert content validation, cognitive interviewing, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, internal-consistency and inter-rater reliability, convergent, discriminant, criterion and incremental validity, measurement-invariance testing, predictive validation and longitudinal intervention studies. AI-assisted analytics are restricted to transparent decision support under privacy, fairness, auditability and human-review controls. The article contributes a comparative theoretical positioning, a simplified evidence-to-action governance loop, a practical implementation blueprint and testable propositions while making no unverified claim of reliability, validity, fairness or causal effect.
Alok Kumar Bhargava, Sonali Sneha· International journal of res...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
