Skip to content
Review Open access

Beyond Self-Rating Leadership: A 360-Degree Audit Architecture for Evidence-Based Executive Maturity Assessment

Aug 2026 · Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability · 0 citations

Abstract

Leadership assessment often privileges self-perception or superior appraisal, even though executive conduct is experienced differently by peers, employees, clients, partners and institutional stakeholders. This paper develops a 360-degree audit architecture for evidence-based executive maturity assessment using the Total Leadership Index (TLI). Unlike conventional multi-source feedback, the proposed architecture does not treat ratings as interchangeable opinions. It preserves source visibility, links scores to observable behaviour and documentary evidence, assigns a separate evidence-confidence grade, fixes role-sensitive weights before data collection, and embeds confidentiality, consent, non-retaliation, calibration and due-process controls. The study follows a conceptual-methodological framework-development approach and integrates literature on multi-source feedback, self-other agreement, performance assessment, sustainable leadership, organizational resilience and succession governance. The resulting model specifies five rater categories, a standard 25-20-25-20-10 weighting structure, source-specific evidence standards, moderation rules, red-flag handling and an implementation cycle for corporations, SMEs, entrepreneurial ventures, project organizations and public institutions. The paper’s principal contribution is to reframe 360-degree feedback from a developmental survey into a governed audit of executive impact across four maturity domains: decision stillness, temporal precision, structured reflection and governed speech. The architecture is positioned as a mechanism for strengthening leadership succession, resilient execution, stakeholder trust and long-term organizational sustainability. Because the model is conceptual, no empirical effectiveness claims are made; a staged validation agenda is proposed for psychometric testing, inter-rater reliability, fairness, predictive validity and longitudinal development outcomes.    

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.