Large language model (LLM)-based agents can exhibit deceptive behavior during task execution, including hiding failures, fabricating results, or falsely signaling task completion. Existing monitoring approaches mainly detect deception after it appears in observable actions or outputs. In this paper, we investigate whet...
Xin-Ling Li, Da-Di Guo, Qing-Yu Liu et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces a multi-agent framework designed to perform problem evolution while validating the solvability and increased difficulty of the generated problems, and provides empirical evidence that code-driven agents can serve as a viable mechanism for synthesizing high-difficulty mathematical reasoning problems...
Dadi Guo, Yue-Jin Xie, Qing-Yu Liu et al.· 0 citations
ATTRICITE, an open 4B-parameter model trained for tool-using citation recovery within the CiteGuard retrieval environment, is introduced and the model and collection pipeline are released to support reproducible research on citation recovery toward faithful attribution in a continually evolving scientific literature.
Yee Man Choi, Xuehang Guo, Songcheng Cai et al.· 0 citations
Across multi-step visual tool-use benchmarks, SPARE achieves the highest average accuracy among pruning methods while removing 37.89-64.58\% of reasoning tokens, showing that reducing textual dominance restores reliance on visual evidence and mitigates over-conditioning on self-generated language.
Yuchen Huang, Sijia Li, Jun Zhang et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.