Skip to content

ATTRICITE: Training an Open 4B Model for Citation Recovery toward Faithful Attribution

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 31 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

ATTRICITE, an open 4B-parameter model trained for tool-using citation recovery within the CiteGuard retrieval environment, is introduced and the model and collection pipeline are released to support reproducible research on citation recovery toward faithful attribution in a continually evolving scientific literature.

Abstract

Faithful citation attribution begins with identifying the intended source for a scientific claim. We study this source-identification capability through citation recovery: recovering the paper cited by the original author from a citation-bearing passage. Our evaluation adopts the published author's citation as an observable human attribution signal and uses target recovery as a proxy for progress toward faithful attribution. We introduce ATTRICITE, an open 4B-parameter model trained for tool-using citation recovery within the CiteGuard retrieval environment, together with CITEALIGN, a 7,607-instance computer-science dataset drawn from recent scientific literature. For controlled evaluation, we construct a 709-instance benchmark subset of CITEALIGN, comprising 410 development instances from 2024 publications and 299 temporally held-out test instances from 2025 publications. Across three runs at an inference temperature of 0.7, GRPO fine-tuning improves Qwen3-4B from 49.4%$\pm$1.5% to 59.8%$\pm$0.2% target-match accuracy, a gain of 10.4 percentage points. Despite using only 4B parameters, ATTRICITE outperforms gpt-oss-20b and comes within 3.9 points of GPT-5.4-mini, while Gemma 4 31B IT achieves the strongest overall performance at 72.0%$\pm$1.0%. We release the model and collection pipeline https://github.com/KathCYM/AttriCite to support reproducible research on citation recovery toward faithful attribution in a continually evolving scientific literature.

View source

Similar papers

Open access 2026

SciCiteVal: A Multi-Domain Dataset for Scientific Citation Verification

Citations are an integral and important part of scientific papers. However, there exist erroneous citations ranging from careless mistakes to deliberate misconduct, and there are currently few studies or benchmark datasets dedicated to automated citation verification. To bridge this gap, we introduce SciCiteVal , a nov...

Qin-Yue Liu, Yong-Xing Zhou, Cyril Labbé · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

Understanding before verifying: Claim normalization for automated citation verification

Citation accuracy has been studied for decades because of its importance to research reliability. Content-level citation verification assesses the reliability of scholarly claims. Recent work adopts a two-stage retrieval-classification framework inherited from fact-checking. However, this design overlooks the complexit...

Yi-Fan He, Meng-Jia Wu, Si-Ming Deng et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

LLM-assisted writing and citation advantage: evidence from scientific publications before and after ChatGPT release

Analysis of a large-scale dataset covering 234,073 research papers published between 2019 and 2025 suggests that AI-assisted writing confers a modest but systematic advantage in visibility and discoverability that translates into higher measured impact.

S. Paklina, P. Parshakov, Elena Rapoport · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

The Attribution-Compression Frontier in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

This work measures citation attribution across compression methods and budgets, comparing reranking, extractive selection, abstractive summarization, token pruning, and an extract-cluster-rewrite construction on ASQA and QASPER under a fixed generator and primary entailment evaluator.

Deepanshu Mody · 2 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Aug 2026

Reconstruction: A Blind Benchmark for Recovering Research Ideas from Pre-Publication Bibliographies

Reconstruction is introduced, a blind idea-recovery benchmark that withholds the seed paper and all contemporaneous or future literature, and asks models to propose hypotheses that an independent large language model judge matches against the held-out ground-truth idea.

Shao-Long Chen, Yanlin Fei, Nazhou Liu et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

Large Language Models for Citation Context and Cited Content Recognition: From Boundary Detection to Evidence Grounding

Citation analysis has traditionally been organized around citation intent, function, stance, citation context analysis, and cited text span identification. Recent large language models (LLMs) have been applied to these tasks through prompting, in-context learning, fine-tuning, annotation assistance, and retrieval-augme...

Shu-Qiao Yang, Xiao-Lei Ma, Ping He · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.