Training-free fusion of heterogeneous multimodal large language models (MLLMs) provides a direct route for cross-scale capability transfer, yet improvements in aggregate performance do not reveal what a smaller model actually inherits. Existing studies are largely designed and evaluated on limited task sets or aggregate metrics; as evaluation expands to broader task collections, whether different capabilities can transfer across scales remains poorly understood. To investigate this question, we introduce Cross-Scale Directional Parameter Injection (CDPI), a simple linear probe to analyze cross-scale knowledge transfer during heterogeneous fusion. A local theoretical analysis indicates that knowledge transfer selectivity is determined at first order by capability-dependent responses to a shared injection direction, while second-order curvature effects constrain the effective transfer regime. Across four Qwen3-VL model pairs and twelve multimodal benchmarks, our experiments reveal a consistent pattern of selectivity: gains concentrate on reasoning, particularly high-level reasoning, whereas perception performance remains close to that of the original target model. Component-wise ablations further show that high-level reasoning gains arise primarily from the language model, while ratio analysis finds that positive selective transfer occurs mainly in the small-ratio regime. These findings recast cross-scale heterogeneous MLLM fusion as selective language-side reasoning transfer within a narrow, low-interference regime, rather than broad capability inheritance.
Yinghao Hou, Jiahe Fan, Yuanhao Pu et al.· 0 citations
Modern recommender systems adopt Generator-Evaluator (G-E) for list-wise reranking: a generator produces sequences from candidates and an evaluator scores them at sequence-level to filter out the optimal one for exposure. Auto-Regressive(AR), working as the backbone for generative recommendation, suffers two limitations. First, its complexity grows linearly with list length, forcing the system to generate fewer lists under rigorous latency constraints and thus limiting exploration. Second, teacher-forcing creates a train-test mismatch; cumulative errors worsen with length and degrade quality. To address these problems, we propose Pair-Space Generation (PSG), a reformulation that elevates the generation atom from individual items to ordered item pairs. Given $n$ candidate items, PSG operates over pair vocabulary of size $n(n-1)$ per request, generates only $L/2$ tokens. Pair token representations are produced on-the-fly by a pretrained pair-token representation module optimized over large scale exposure logs, eliminating the data sparsity that would otherwise plague a quadratic sized vocabulary. We establish three theoretical guarantees: (i) PSG is bijective with item-space generation and induces an equivalent family of sequence distributions, thus incurring no loss of expressiveness; (ii) generation in pair-token space achieves approximately a $2\times$ to $4\times$ speedup theoretically under moderate settings and $1.83\times$ in the real industrial environmental settings; and (iii) under outcome-only rewards, the worst-case suboptimality of PSG is bounded by $O((L/2)^2 \bar{\epsilon})$, representing a nearly $4\times$ improvement over item-space generation. Beyond benchmark-based validation, PSG has also been deployed on Kuaishou, delivering a 0.178\% lift in per-user stay time on the platform, which serves over 400 million daily active users.
Chao Feng, Li Ma, Xiancheng Gao et al.· 0 citations