Cross-scale heterogeneous MLLM fusion is recast as selective language-side reasoning transfer within a narrow, low-interference regime, rather than broad capability inheritance, to recast cross-scale capability transfer within a narrow, low-interference regime.
Abstract
Training-free fusion of heterogeneous multimodal large language models (MLLMs) provides a direct route for cross-scale capability transfer, yet improvements in aggregate performance do not reveal what a smaller model actually inherits. Existing studies are largely designed and evaluated on limited task sets or aggregate metrics; as evaluation expands to broader task collections, whether different capabilities can transfer across scales remains poorly understood. To investigate this question, we introduce Cross-Scale Directional Parameter Injection (CDPI), a simple linear probe to analyze cross-scale knowledge transfer during heterogeneous fusion. A local theoretical analysis indicates that knowledge transfer selectivity is determined at first order by capability-dependent responses to a shared injection direction, while second-order curvature effects constrain the effective transfer regime. Across four Qwen3-VL model pairs and twelve multimodal benchmarks, our experiments reveal a consistent pattern of selectivity: gains concentrate on reasoning, particularly high-level reasoning, whereas perception performance remains close to that of the original target model. Component-wise ablations further show that high-level reasoning gains arise primarily from the language model, while ratio analysis finds that positive selective transfer occurs mainly in the small-ratio regime. These findings recast cross-scale heterogeneous MLLM fusion as selective language-side reasoning transfer within a narrow, low-interference regime, rather than broad capability inheritance.
Evidence is provided that cross-scale heterogeneous fusion can succeed without explicit semantic alignment when the donor contribution is sufficiently concentrated and carefully selected, and that activation-guided extraction improves the quality of the transferable donor slice while preserving the small-ratio fusion r...
Jiahe Fan, Si Chen, Yinghao Hou et al.· 0 citations
This work evaluates 10 state-of-the-art MLLMs and examines three factors that influence performance: reasoning patterns, auxiliary tools, and robustness to image perturbations, showing that MLLM accuracy decreases and varies substantially as computational complexity increases.
Ziyan Xiao, Yinghao Zhu, Wen-Ting Zhang et al.· 1 citation
This work introduces DocHop, a benchmark for integrated chart--context reasoning in document-style images and constructs DocHop via a stochastic logic-first generation pipeline with controllable reasoning depth and visual density, to enable systematic evaluation.
Zhuoran Yu, Le Thien Phuc Nguyen, Jaden Park et al.· 1 citation
This work investigates how MLLMs learn novel concepts by introducing concepts in unimodal pre-training or multimodal fine-tuning, and evaluates the model’s ability to generalize between the two settings, and evaluates how deeply a model maps concepts across modalities.
S. Boppana, Tian Yun, C. Curto et al.· 0 citations
The factors underlying performance differences across matcher architectures are clarified and motivate future research and benchmark designs that better disentangle architectural choices from model-level factors while explicitly evaluating distribution shift and cross-dataset transferability.
Centroid Intervention Fusion is proposed, a projection fusion framework that consolidates multiple multilingual intervention projections into a single language-shared operator and outperforms the strongest prior pairwise intervention baseline by up to +3.3% across four model backbones.
Wei Sun, Marie-Francine Moens· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.