Skip to content

Category

natural language processing

9,568 papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access Oct 2026

On the Limits of LLM Adaptability: Impact of Model-Internalized Priors on Annotation Task Performance

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for zero-shot annotation and LLM-as-a-judge tasks, yet their reliability hinges on how model-internalized priors interact with user-provided instructions. We investigate three dimensions of this interaction: (1) how an LLM's familiarity with data and task definitions r...

Etienne Casanova, Rafal Kocielnik, R. Michael Alvarez · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access Oct 2026

Where Do Apparent LLM Clinical Triage Failures Arise? Localizing the Multiple-Choice Format Effect

LLM evaluations using clinician-authored triage vignettes have reported substantial under-triage under constrained multiple-choice testing. Yet model performance on the same clinical cases can change when responses are generated in free text. We test whether this format effect appears while the case is processed or whe...

David Fraile Navarro, Berardino Como, Jialei Sheng et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access Oct 2026

EchoDistill: Robust Large Audio Language Models via Noisy-to-Clean Self-Distillation

Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) remain vulnerable to acoustic noise, which can obscure task-relevant evidence and produce unreliable responses. We propose EchoDistill, a noisy-to-clean self-distillation framework that uses clean audio as privileged information during post-training. A noisy-input student samples can...

Kaiwen Luo, Chunxi Luo, Liang Lin et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access Oct 2026

FastKernels: Benchmarking GPU Kernel Generation in Production

LLM-based agents for GPU kernel generation are advancing rapidly, but the benchmarks they optimize against evaluate kernels in isolation, with synthetic inputs and weak baselines, rewarding sandbox speedups that break or vanish in real inference systems. We introduce FastKernels, a benchmark of 384 tasks drawn from 47...

Gabriele Oliaro, Jaeseong Lee, Yichao Fu et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access Oct 2026

HINT-SD: Targeted Hindsight Self-Distillation for Long-Horizon Agents

Training long-horizon LLM agents with reinforcement learning is challenging because sparse outcome rewards reveal whether a task succeeds, but not which intermediate actions caused the outcome or how they should be corrected. Recent methods alleviate this issue by generating rewards or textual hints from turn-level act...

Woongyeong Yeo, Yumin Choi, Taekyung Ki et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access Oct 2026

Recursive Agent Optimization

We introduce Recursive Agent Optimization (RAO), a reinforcement learning approach for training recursive agents: agents that can spawn and delegate sub-tasks to new instantiations of themselves recursively. Recursive agents implement an inference-time scaling algorithm that naturally allows agents to scale to longer c...

Apurva Gandhi, Satyaki Chakraborty, Xiangjun Wang et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access Oct 2026

Who Guards the Benchmarks? Automated Auditing of LLM Agent Benchmarks

As benchmarks grow in complexity, many apparent agent failures are not failures of the agent at all---they are failures of the benchmark itself: broken specifications, implicit assumptions, and rigid evaluation scripts that penalize valid alternative approaches. We propose employing frontier LLMs as systematic auditors...

Xinming Tu (Minta), Tianze Wang (Minta), Yingzhou (Minta) et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access Oct 2026

How Do AI Agents Spend Your Money? Analyzing and Predicting Token Consumption in Agentic Coding Tasks

The wide adoption of AI agents in complex human workflows is driving rapid growth in LLM token consumption. When agents are deployed on tasks that require a significant amount of tokens, three questions naturally arise: (1) Where do AI agents spend the tokens? (2) Which models are more token-efficient? and (3) Can agen...

Longju Bai, Zhemin Huang, Xingyao Wang et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access Oct 2026

Rhetorical Questions in LLM Representations: A Linear Probing Study

Rhetorical questions are asked not to seek information but to persuade or signal stance. How large language models internally represent them remains unclear. We analyze rhetorical questions in LLM representations using linear probes on two social-media datasets with different discourse contexts, and find that rhetorica...

Louie Hong Yao, Vishesh Anand, Yuan Zhuang et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access Oct 2026

Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Adaptive Multimodal Fact-Checking with Visual Evidence Necessity

Automated fact-checking is a crucial task that supports a responsible information ecosystem. While recent research has progressed from text-only to multimodal fact-checking, a prevailing assumption is that incorporating visual evidence universally improves verification accuracy. In this work, we challenge this assumpti...

Jaeyoon Jung, Yejun Yoon, Kunwoo Park · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access Oct 2026

Many Preferences, Few Policies: Compact Portfolios for Multi-Objective LLM Alignment

Aligning large language models (LLMs) requires balancing competing objectives such as helpfulness, harmlessness, and conciseness. The appropriate balance varies across users and applications, yet training, evaluating, and deploying many policies across different reward weights is costly. We study how to identify a smal...

Cheol Woo Kim, Jai Moondra, Roozbeh Nahavandi et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access Oct 2026

Sensory-Aware Sequential Recommendation via Review-Distilled Representations

Sequential recommenders learn behavioral patterns from item identifiers, while the experiential properties that users describe in reviews, such as how products look, feel, smell, taste, or sound, rarely enter item representations in a controlled, auditable form. We present ASER (Attribute-based Sensory-Enhanced Repre...

Yeo Chan Yoon, Chanjun Park, Kyuhan Koh · 0 citations

From tech blogs

See all →
Microsoft Research Blog Oct 22, 2026

Flint-interactive: A language for creating interactive data visualizations

Flint-interactive gives AI agents a language for creating interactive visualizations. Click a chart, filter data, highlight related content, and explore beyond the view the author originally chose. The post Flint-interactive: A language for creating interactive data visualizations appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.