Aug 2026· European journal of internal medicine· pp.
107172
· 0 citations· 68 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This review addresses the primary ethical principles relevant to AI in medicine - including respect for patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice - alongside key legal frameworks with respect to liability, data protection, regulatory compliance, and algorithmic transparency.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into medical practice marks a transformative shift within healthcare delivery, diagnostics, and treatment paradigms. Although AI systems exhibit sophisticated capabilities in image recognition, predictive analytics, and clinical decision support, their implementation introduces fundamental ethical and legal questions requiring thorough examination. This review addresses the primary ethical principles relevant to AI in medicine - including respect for patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice - alongside key legal frameworks with respect to liability, data protection, regulatory compliance, and algorithmic transparency. It analyzes challenges such as algorithmic bias, patient privacy, informed consent in automated decision-making, and the evolving responsibilities of healthcare professionals in AI-based clinical environments. Additionally, the review investigates emerging regulatory approaches across jurisdictions, considering how existing medical device regulations, data protection laws, and professional liability frameworks are adapting to AI technologies. The paper concludes with recommendations for clinicians, policymakers, and developers to promote ethical AI deployment that strengthens the physician-patient relationship and advances healthcare equity.
It is concluded that the responsible use of artificial intelligence in medicine depends on human supervision, professional training, and the integration of bioethical principles, ensuring technological innovation aligned with safety and patient-centered care.
Hélio Silva Dias, Hengrid Graciely Nascimento Silva, Italo Bezerra et al.· Revista de Estudos Interdisc...· 0 citations
A narrative review synthesises the current literature, regulatory frameworks, and ethical guidelines about the medicolegal dimensions of AI in healthcare, without adherence to a formal systematic review protocol, to address significant medico-legal and ethical challenges facing AI in healthcare.
M. Niriella, Krishanni Prabagar, I. Wijesingha et al.· AI and Ethics· 0 citations
Analysis of six areas of artificial intelligence in healthcare concludes that a workable framework must combine the principles of medical negligence law with data protection, consumer protection and sectoral safety requirements, together with governance mechanisms for artificial intelligence such as human oversight, au...
Ashish Kumar Kureel, B. Yadav· International Journal of Law...· 0 citations
The ethical and legal considerations that come with using AI today are discussed, including algorithmic bias, the economic divide that limits AI access, the lack of transparency and explainability of black-box models, the threat to radiology residents from automation bias, and post-deployment model drift.
Vineet Upadhyaya, Vibhav Mithal, Amit Gupta et al.· Indian Journal of Radiology...· 0 citations
Whether AI can meaningfully participate in care is examined, ethical tensions between automation and moral attentiveness are identified, and normative limits for AI use in healthcare grounded in human dignity, relational responsibility, and moral agency are proposed.
Marlon Patrick P. Lofredo· Health Sciences Quarterly· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.