This work proposes External Rollout Integration with Length Control and Source-Specific Processing (ERILS), which controls external-rollout length and processes the rewards of on-policy and external rollouts separately, and shows that length-controlled external rollouts are more effective than uncontrolled external rollouts.
Abstract
Recent reinforcement learning methods for diffusion large language models (dLLMs) commonly rely on on-policy rollouts generated by the target dLLM itself. When successful on-policy rollouts are scarce, however, on-policy training may receive little positive reward and make only limited progress. To mitigate this problem, we explore incorporating higher-reward rollouts generated by a stronger external policy alongside on-policy rollouts from the target dLLM. However, directly incorporating these external rollouts introduces two practical challenges: differences in rollout length and instability when jointly processing rewards from on-policy and external rollouts. To address these challenges, we propose External Rollout Integration with Length Control and Source-Specific Processing (ERILS), which controls external-rollout length and processes the rewards of on-policy and external rollouts separately. Experiments on Sudoku, Countdown, and MATH500 under zero-shot evaluation show that ERILS improves multi-sample performance across all three tasks, with the largest gains on Sudoku. On Sudoku, ERILS achieves 98.4% best-of-4 completion accuracy, compared with 40.3% for the strongest baseline. ERILS also maintains approximately 90% deterministic single-completion accuracy on Sudoku across generation lengths of 128, 256, and 512 tokens. Our component analysis further shows that length-controlled external rollouts are more effective than uncontrolled external rollouts, and that source-specific reward processing avoids the training collapse observed with joint reward processing. These results show that rollout construction and reward processing are important design dimensions when integrating external rollouts into dLLM reinforcement learning.
On-policy learning has been argued to reduce catastrophic forgetting, produce sparser parameter updates, and improve generalisation. However, existing comparisons between supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning vary many factors simultaneously, making the contribution of rollout policy difficult to isolate. W...
Julianna Piskorz, Antonin Berthon, M. van der Schaar· 0 citations
This work introduces Minimal Intervention Reinforcement Learning (MInTRL), which expands the exploration frontier through sparse, local interventions in otherwise on-policy rollouts, and establishes minimal intervention as an effective paradigm for enhancing on-policy RL.
Ming-Yu Chen, Ye-Fan Tao, Gerald Friedland et al.· 0 citations
Reinforcement learning with a verifiable reward (RLVR) offers a scalable approach to training language-model agents, yet sparse outcome rewards can leave early training with little signal for policy improvement. We identify an On-Policy Acceleration Phenomenon: in our main comparisons, RLVR initialized with on-policy d...
Yi-Tong Qiao, Tian-Tian He, Lei Liu et al.· 0 citations
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) methods such as GRPO rely on successful self-generated trajectories, but finite rollout budgets can produce all-fail groups with no reward-based policy-gradient signal. While additional rollouts improve the chance of success at higher cost, successful trajectories m...
Doohyuk Jang, Y. Park, Gyouk Chu et al.· 0 citations
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a central post-training approach for reasoning and agentic large language models (LLMs), particularly when task outcomes can be verified automatically. Comparisons across this literature remain difficult because a reported gain may combine changes to the learning signal, policy co...
Liu Yang, Han Zhu, Zheng-Yang Zhong et al.· Unmanned Systems· 0 citations
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a standard paradigm for improving large language models (LLMs) on various tasks, yet its sparse outcome rewards lack token-level credit assignment for intermediate steps. To address this, on-policy self-distillation (OPSD) leverages a self-teacher with pr...
Zhenrui Yue, Hui-Min Zeng, Yue-Qi Wang et al.· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 2, 2026
Martin Trust Center Managing Director Bill Aulet introduces Dear Dreamer, a free platform for middle and high school students who want to learn about entrepreneurship.
Microsoft Research Blog· microsoft.comSep 30, 2026
Extreme space-weather events can damage power systems on Earth and degrade GPS accuracy and satellite operations. A new machine learning system can predict where damage is likely to occur 30-60 minutes before a storm arrives. The post Forecasting space weather risks on power grids appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.