Skip to content

Skill Deprioritization: Reorganizing in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence

Jul 2026 · Management Sciences · 0 citations · 57 references

TL;DR

It is demonstrated that firms engage in immediate and selective skill deprioritization, raising questions about longer-term hollowing out of human expertise in automated domains and providing early empirical evidence on how GenAI is reshaping organizational skill demands.

Abstract

How does generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) reshape the skills that organizations seek as they adapt to a new general-purpose technology? GenAI effectively retrieves data, performs analysis, and conveys information, so it can substitute for workers doing these activities and complement workers relying on them. A natural consequence is skill deprioritization, a systematic reduction in firms’ demand for human skills that GenAI can effectively address as organizations adjust the division of labor and integration of effort. We draw on a theoretically grounded classification of organizing skills—task division, task allocation, information provision, reward distribution, and exception management—and a queuing theory model of organizing efficiency to predict which skills firms will deprioritize first. Using a quasiexperimental design that leverages the introduction of ChatGPT as an exogenous shock, we analyze 1,820 publicly listed U.S. companies and track changes in their hiring demand patterns over a period of a ±12-month window surrounds the shock. We find significant declines in demand for monitoring (reward distribution), operational exceptions, and task division skills, with information provision also showing declines. Task allocation and conflict resolution showed greater stability, suggesting greater reliance on human judgment. These effects intensify following GPT-4’s release, indicating that capability improvements also drive adaptation. Our findings demonstrate that firms engage in immediate and selective skill deprioritization, raising questions about longer-term hollowing out of human expertise in automated domains. We contribute a novel taxonomy of organizing skills, extend queuing theory to the GenAI context, and provide early empirical evidence on how GenAI is reshaping organizational skill demands. This paper was accepted by Anita McGahan, strategy. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2025.01859 .

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

The Complementarity Paradox: Human-AI Collaboration, Overreliance, and Skill Decline in Entrepreneurial Contexts

It is argued that a strong long-term orientation can amplify the conversion of collaboration depth into dependence, since future-focused individuals may reframe routine use as a strategic investment and assign less immediate priority to corrective practice.

Srinivas Subramanya, Satish Krishnan, Nasreen Azad · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

Cheap, Fallible Cognition and the Political Economy of Expertise

The paper concludes that AI's labor-market destiny is neither mechanical unemployment nor automatic abundance, and is an institutional equilibrium shaped by workflow design, apprenticeship systems, liability rules, competition policy, worker voice, and the distribution of rents from cheap cognition.

Christoph Kolb, J. Caron · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

The Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Modern Business Decision-Making: Applications, Opportunities, and Future Challenges

GenAI's current business value is concentrated in augmenting, rather than automating, decision-making, with the strongest evidence for productivity gains among relatively lower-skilled or lower-performing decision-makers, and the mapping of AI capability boundaries within specific decision domains as the central future...

Rajidi Rammohan Reddy, V. Thumar, Amar Jyoti Borah et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Reskilled or Left Behind: The Hidden Inequality in AI Training

This research blog argues that AI may create inequality not only through job displacement but also through unequal access to adaptation, not only through job displacement but also through unequal access to adaptation.

Tilottama Ahmed, Farzana Rahman · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Designing Work for the Age of AI: Strategic Responses to Human-Machine Complementarity

Emerging evidence on AI's dual capacity to automate tasks and augment human capabilities, offering leaders a framework for navigating this transition is synthesizes, and five dimensions of distinctively human capability are identified—Empathy, Presence, Opinion, Creativity, and Hope—that complement rather than compete...

Jonathan H. Westover · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Generative AI in Enterprise Decision Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges

It is argued that organizations capturing durable value are not necessarily those with the most advanced models, but those that have redesigned decision workflows, built human-in-the-loop verification into high-stakes processes, and treated GenAI as a collaborator rather than an oracle.

Naresh Sharma, Rohit Kumar, Himanshu Verma et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.