Oct 2026· IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing· Vol 25, pp. 18103-18116· 0 citations· 41 references
Abstract
Multi-UAV-assisted mobile edge computing (MEC) has emerged as a promising paradigm for smart city infrastructures, where multiple uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) collaboratively provide airborne computing services by bringing computational resources closer to end users, thereby reducing both communication costs and service latency. Existing multi-UAV-assisted MEC approaches typically employ fixed allocation schemes that predetermine the number of UAVs for a service area, failing to adapt to heterogeneous regional demands and leaving substantial UAV fleet capacity underutilized. To address this issue, we consider a multi-area multi-UAV-assisted MEC scenario where the control center jointly optimizes UAV deployment, user association, and resource allocation for each service area based on actual regional demands. This optimization enables multiple UAVs to be allocated to high-demand areas while assigning fewer UAVs to low-demand areas, thereby maximizing the service capacity of the entire UAV fleet. We formulate the optimization problem as a constrained multi-objective optimization problem (CMOP) that simultaneously minimizes the total system energy consumption and average user task completion delay, subject to deployment, user association, resource capacity, and task completion delay constraints. To effectively solve this CMOP, we propose a constrained multi-objective evolutionary algorithm that systematically reconstructs infeasible solutions into feasible ones through a constraint-guided solution reconstruction mechanism, thereby accelerating convergence toward feasible regions. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that our algorithm outperforms five state-of-the-art baseline methods in solution diversity and convergence performance. The results validate the effectiveness of flexible UAV allocation strategies, establishing a foundation for demand-aware resource provisioning in multi-UAV-assisted MEC systems.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.