The AI Trust and Assurance Layer (ATAL), a model-agnostic decision assurance architecture that evaluates whether AI-generated flight-planning outputs are sufficiently reliable for operational use, is proposed.
Abstract
Generative AI is increasingly being used informally in Air Traffic Management (ATM) for tasks such as flight plan generation, trajectory interpretation, and constraint checking. Although these tools can reduce workload and accelerate planning, their non-deterministic outputs create safety and operational risks in human-in-the-loop settings. This paper proposes the AI Trust and Assurance Layer (ATAL), a model-agnostic decision assurance architecture that evaluates whether AI-generated flight-planning outputs are sufficiently reliable for operational use. ATAL combines semantic stability under prompt variation, operational consistency of structured outputs, and normative constraint validation against domain rules, and maps these signals to a Decision Readiness Level (DRL) for human operators. An ATM-inspired experimental study shows how unsafe, inconsistent, or misleading outputs can be identified before influencing flight-plan validation or execution. Although demonstrated in aviation, the framework is also transferable to other safety-critical decision-support domains that require human oversight under regulatory constraints.
Preliminary results show the possible impact of the introduction of an AI-based decision-support tool in operating procedures for airspace configuration, especially on Flow Management Position operators’ cognitive workload, situation awareness, trust, and adequate human oversight.
D. Ruscio, Marianna Groia, L. Perrotta· Proceedings of the 2026 Euro...· 0 citations
This work presents a method for representativeness assessment of AI/ML constituent ODDs in the context of aviation safety assurance and illustrates how statistical distribution comparison methods can support the assessment of representativeness for safety-critical AI applications.
Thomas Stefani, J. Christensen, Elena Hoemann et al.· 0 citations
Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) has become a mandated practice for Department of Defense acquisition programs, yet measured benefits remain elusive. The 2024 Defense Science Board found that less than one percent of published literature actually quantified MBSE outcomes, and flagship ground vehicle programs suc...
Michael Wagner, Nelson Santini, Anoop Balakrishnan· SAE technical paper series· 0 citations
Smart seaports increasingly rely on AIS-based decision support, yet pairwise collision indicators and learned predictors do not by themselves determine when automated alerts remain trustworthy under multi-vessel coupling and degraded evidence. This study presents an interpretable scene-level extension of PortGuard-AIS...
The continuous growth of air traffic has significantly increased the workload of air traffic controllers (ATCOs), posing challenges to the efficient and safe operation of area control. This paper proposes an intelligent decision-making framework for en-route sector operations based on an analysis of the primary tasks o...
Ze-Kai Zhou, Yu-Xin Nie, D. Sui et al.· Aerospace· 0 citations
This paper proposes a conceptual Agentic AI architecture for AI systems that can plan, access data sources, execute tools, and act autonomously and audibly, aimed at supporting decision-making across the three Brazilian Armed Forces.
Gioliano de Oliveira Braga, Sidnei Barbieri, Ágney Lopes Roth Ferraz et al.· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
With $2.1 million funding from Google.org, the open-source Public Transit Intelligence Hub will unify public transit monitoring, operations, and passenger communication.