Skip to content

TOPO-Bench: An Open-Source Topological Mapping Evaluation Framework with Quantifiable Perceptual Aliasing

Oct 2025 · IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · pp. 2172-2179 · 1 citation · 32 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work formalizes topological consistency as the fundamental property of topological maps and shows that, under mild assumptions, localization accuracy provides an efficient and interpretable surrogate metric, and introduces the first quantitative measure of dataset ambiguity for fair comparison across environments.

Abstract

Topological mapping offers a compact and robust representation for navigation, but progress in the field is hindered by the lack of standardized evaluation metrics, datasets, and protocols. Existing systems are evaluated in different environments under different criteria, preventing fair and reproducible comparison. Moreover, a key challenge—perceptual aliasing—remains under-quantified despite its strong influence on system performance. We address these gaps by (i) formalizing topological consistency as the fundamental property of topological maps and showing that, under mild assumptions, localization accuracy provides an efficient and interpretable surrogate metric, and (ii) introducing the first quantitative measure of dataset ambiguity for fair comparison across environments. To support this protocol, we curate a diverse benchmark dataset with calibrated ambiguity levels, implement and release deep learning-based baseline systems, and evaluate them alongside classical methods. Our experiments provide new insights into the limitations of current approaches under perceptual aliasing. All datasets, baselines, and evaluation tools are publicly released to foster consistent and reproducible research in topological mapping.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.