Skip to content

LEXIC: Lightweight On-Device Decoding of Reading Comprehension from Eye Movements

Jul 2026 · 0 citations · 21 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

LEXIC, a compact recurrent model that predicts response correctness from fixation sequences, word frequency, and character length, has 41.6K parameters and requires no language-model inference, supporting lightweight on-device inference.

Abstract

Predicting comprehension from eye movements could support adaptive reading interfaces. We present LEXIC, a compact recurrent model that predicts response correctness from fixation sequences, word frequency, and character length. It has 41.6K parameters and requires no language-model inference. Mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) reaches 0.529 for Unseen Text and 0.554 for Unseen Reader on OneStop. Matched comparisons with AhnCNN show gains from both encoder redesign and lexical augmentation in these settings. Separate training and evaluation on SB-SAT also yield higher mean AUROC than AhnCNN. LEXIC occupies only 166 KB of model weights and requires 1.4 ms per trial on a single CPU core, supporting lightweight on-device inference.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

STRUCTURALCOST: A controlled reading time dataset for modeling human sentence processing difficulty

We introduce STRUCTURALCOST, a self-paced reading dataset of 475 participants and 40,800 observations isolating the processing cost of long-distance subject-verb dependency resolution. We replicate a low-powered psycholinguistic finding at NLP scale, namely that human reading times at the main verb increase with depend...

Nina Nusbaumer, Iria de-Dios-Flores, Corentin Bel et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Oct 2026

The Cognitive Cost of LLM Writing: A Reading-Time Comparison with Human Text

Although linguistic differences between human-written and Large Language Model (LLM)-generated texts have been extensively studied, their implications for the cognitive effort involved in reading remain less explored. In psycholinguistics, reading time is commonly used as an indirect measure of cognitive processing eff...

Kamer Cekini, Elisabetta Biondi, C. Boldrini et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Semantic Update as a Predictor of Reading Time: Moving Beyond Word-Level Surprisal

This study explores the role of semantic prediction error in shaping reading behavior, as reflected in reading time during naturalistic reading. We operationalize semantic prediction error using semantic update (SU), a measure derived from the Sentence Gestalt (SG) model, which simulates incremental predictive comprehe...

Siddharth Gupta, A. Lopopolo, Milena Rabovsky · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Goals Drive Adaptive Analysis of Linguistic Features During Reading

Reading behaviour is sensitive to contextual demands. For example, when reading to study or answer questions, readers strategically allocate more attention to goal-relevant sections, read slower, and regress more frequently to extract specific information based on task demands. This suggests that readers flexibly adapt...

Pepita Alex, Julia Schwarz, B. Tatler et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Visual Jev: Accurate and Efficient Decisions from Shared Visual Context

Many vision applications ask several independent, forced-choice questions about the same image. Visual Jev encodes the image and public context once, executes isolated question suffixes as a batch, and reads candidate probabilities from the backbone's language-model head. Across four benchmarks, answer-supervised post-...

Guan-Xu Yu, Yu-Hang Yao · 14 citations · ⚡1
Open access Sep 2026

Optimizing L2 English Reading Speed and Comprehension Through Artificial Intelligence: A Psycholinguistic and Pedagogical Framework

Artificial intelligence (AI) is proposed as a means of improving second-language (L2) English reading. The pedagogical problem, however, is not maximizing words per minute but helping readers allocate processing resources so that lexical access becomes more efficient without sacrificing syntactic integration, inference...

Saaid Ali Omar · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 28, 2026

Making machines that can listen

Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.