MASA (Multimodal-LLM-Anchored Semantic Adaptation), which complements model-internal evidence with structured semantic descriptions from a frozen multimodal large language model (MLLM) to limit inference cost.
Abstract
Wild test-time adaptation (WTTA) updates a source model online under small test batches, concurrent distribution shifts, and time-varying class imbalance. Most WTTA methods derive their adaptation signals, including predictive uncertainty, sample reliability, and local feature geometry, from the model being adapted. When the source model is unreliable under shift, these signals can reinforce its own errors, forming a self-referential loop. We introduce MASA (Multimodal-LLM-Anchored Semantic Adaptation), which complements model-internal evidence with structured semantic descriptions from a frozen multimodal large language model (MLLM). To limit inference cost, MASA queries the MLLM only for a small set of diverse, reliability-ranked anchors. The resulting descriptions capture the object family and nuisance factors such as style, viewpoint, and occlusion. MASA encodes these descriptions, propagates them to neighboring test samples, and stores the resulting visual-semantic information in an online prototype memory. Descriptor-aware retrieval from this memory provides an auxiliary target for lightweight adaptation of normalization-affine parameters. We evaluate MASA on the WTTA ImageNet-C benchmark under limited-batch, mixed-domain, and imbalanced-label-shift settings with ResNet and ViT backbones.
This paper proposes Test-Time Correction (TTC), a hypothesis-based correction framework guided by a simple principle: hypothesize, reconstruct, correct, that consistently improves accuracy over state-of-the-art VLM-TTA methods while achieving up to 2x speedup, over 3x lower CPU memory usage, and up to 1.4x lower GPU me...
The result is a practical way to separate two failure modes that are usually mixed together: a weak selector versus an information channel that cannot support the desired decision in the first place.
Alignment does not eliminate behavioral errors in language models. Models may still refuse benign requests, call unnecessary tools, or yield to false user claims. Current methods mitigate such errors as a computation problem, and rarely explore if the desired behavior is already encoded in the model's representation. M...
Zirui He, Hai-Yan Zhao, Jing-Yu Hu et al.· 0 citations
Autoregressive large language models (LLMs) have rapidly advanced in capability, but their increasing scale comes with substantial computational and memory costs at inference time. Knowledge distillation (KD) offers a practical solution by transferring knowledge from a large teacher model to a smaller student model via...
Byeonghu Na, Donghyeok Shin, Yeongmin Kim et al.· 0 citations
Test-Time Training (TTT) adapts models to incoming test samples (e.g. out-of-distribution, (OOD)) when conventional fine-tuning is infeasible. Existing TTT methods for Vision-Language Models (VLMs) create supervision from several augmented views, each requiring forward (and often backward) passes through the entire VLM...
Rajat Modi, Priyank Pathak, Xin Liang et al.· 0 citations