Jul 2026· Annals of Social Sciences & Management Studies· Vol 13· 0 citations
TL;DR
Students perceived AI as most beneficial for research and problem-solving activities, while its contribution to critical thinking, coordination, and cooperation was viewed more cautiously, and students considered AI most effective when used as a support tool for clarification, feedback, and verification rather than as a replacement for independent learning.
Abstract
The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools has influenced the way students approach learning, research, communication, and collaboration. This study examines students’ preferred communication methods, their use of AI tools, and perceptions of AI’s contribution to higher-order thinking and team-building skills. A survey-based approach was used to explore students’ experiences and their views regarding the role of AI in academic activities. Communication results showed a strong preference for digital platforms, particularly WhatsApp, email, and Microsoft Teams, while many still rely on in-person meetings. The findings indicate that ChatGPT was the most widely used AI tool among respondents, followed by Gemini and Copilot. Students perceived AI as most beneficial for research and problem-solving activities, while its contribution to critical thinking, coordination, and cooperation was viewed more cautiously. Qualitative responses further revealed that students considered AI most effective when used as a support tool for clarification, feedback, and verification rather than as a replacement for independent learning. The study highlights the importance of promoting responsible AI use that supports, rather than replaces, student engagement, critical thinking, and collaboration.
It is suggested that AI technologies have considerable potential to enrich higher education; however, their successful implementation requires careful attention to ethical, technological, and pedagogical considerations to ensure that educational benefits are achieved while minimizing associated risks.
H. U. C. P. Hewawasam, D. Saparamadu· Sabaragamuwa University Jour...· 0 citations
Generative AI has an overall positive short-term impact on higher-level thinking skills, with the most significant improvements in problem-solving, moderate improvements in critical thinking, and relatively low improvements in creativity.
Fareen Wahid· International Journal of Inn...· 0 citations
It is argued that universities should train and encourage students to use ChatGPT, as it is likely to become a common tool in the workplace and the importance of preparing students for a future that embraces AI technologies is highlighted.
A. Talib· INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOC...· 0 citations
This study examines the growing influence of artificial intelligence (AI) tools on student research in higher education, focusing on both their opportunities and challenges, and recommends comprehensive institutional guidelines, targeted training programs, and ethical frameworks to ensure responsible integration of AI.
Edelresa S Juachon, Honorata Yaneza, Arthur Cabradilla et al.· JPAIR Institutional Research· 0 citations
The findings revealed a dual-pathway effect: on one hand, AI functions as a cognitive scaffold that enhances understanding, supports idea generation, and improves academic performance, and on the other hand, it acts as a cognitive substitute that reduces analytical engagement, encourages and promotes superficial learni...
B. Usman· International journal of edu...· 0 citations
It is suggested that AI-supported learning can provide accessible opportunities for developing vocabulary, grammar, speaking, writing, and related soft skills regardless of previous exposure, and practical guidance for integrating AI tools into communication education is provided.
Newbegin S, Ramkumar E. V.· Asian Journal of Interdiscip...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.