Skip to content
Open access

Differential Effects of Polyethylene and Polystyrene Microplastics on the Composition and Functional Attributes of the Oat (Avena sativa L.) Rhizosphere Microbiome

Aug 2026 · Plants · Vol 15, pp. 2403 · 0 citations · 94 references
Medicine

Abstract

Microplastics (MPs) are increasingly accumulating in agricultural soils, while their effects on crop-associated rhizosphere microbial communities and ecological functions remain insufficiently understood, particularly for different polymer types. In this study, polyethylene (PE) and polystyrene (PS) microplastics with the same particle size (2 μm) were applied at different concentrations (0, 0.1%, 0.5%, 1%, and 5%, w/w) to investigate their effects on oat rhizosphere bacterial communities and predicted functional potentials. The results showed that microplastic addition significantly altered bacterial community diversity, composition, and predicted functional profiles. Compared to the control (Ctrl), the 1% PE treatment significantly reduced bacterial richness-related indices (p < 0.05), whereas PS mainly affected bacterial diversity. Microplastic treatments also reshaped dominant bacterial taxa and altered the predicted functional potentials associated with carbon and nitrogen cycling. In particular, the 1% PE treatment significantly reduced the predicted relative abundance of the carbon fixation-related gene cbbL (p < 0.05). In addition, high-concentration (5%) PE enhanced several predicted functional potentials related to nitrogen cycling, including nifH, ureA, and amoC. Overall, PE and PS microplastics induced polymer- and concentration-dependent changes in oat rhizosphere bacterial communities. These findings suggest that microplastic accumulation in agricultural soils may influence ecosystem processes by modifying microbial diversity and potential biogeochemical functions. This study provides new insights into the ecological consequences of different microplastic polymers in crop rhizosphere ecosystems and highlights the importance of considering polymer-specific effects when evaluating soil microplastic pollution.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Effects of biogas slurry-borne antibiotics and polypropylene microplastics on the rhizosphere microbiome and metabolome of Hybrid Pennisetum.

Antibiotic residues in biogas slurry and microplastic contamination are increasingly occurring in agricultural soils. However, their combined effects on rhizosphere ecological processes remain poorly understood. In this study, the individual and combined effects of polypropylene microplastics (PP-MPs, 1% w/w) and bioga...

Xi-Liang Song, Lin-Hong Teng, Hong Jiang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Dual Effects of Polyethylene Microplastics on Solanum lycopersicum L.‐Soil Systems: Plant Growth Promotion and Microbial Network Simplification

Low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) and high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) particles are primary components of agricultural mulch films. The extensive application and degradation of these films lead to the accumulation of microplastics (MPs) in soil, necessitating an integrated assessment of their impact on crop‐soil sys...

Yun-Qing Liu, Jia-Xing Zhang, Jin-Yu Wu et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Biodegradable mulch films promote sugarcane growth by regulating rhizosphere microbial communities and predicted nutrient cycling-related functional potentials

Introduction Conventional polyethylene (PE) mulch causes persistent soil plastic pollution; biodegradable mulch films (BMFs) may avoid this, but their effects on sugarcane rhizosphere microbes and yield are unclear. Methods Using a field trial in Yunnan, we compared polyethylene mulch (PM) with two PBAT/PLA-based biode...

Qian-Yuan Duan, Qiang Liu, Xin-Ping Mao et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Responses of Rhizosphere Soil Physicochemical Properties and Enzyme Activities to Polyethylene Microplastic Stress in Maize–Soybean Intercropping

Agricultural microplastics threaten soil health, yet rhizosphere microecological responses to microplastic stress in intercropping systems remain unclear. We conducted a pot experiment using two cropping systems (maize monocropping and maize–soybean intercropping) and four polyethylene microplastic (PE-MP) levels (0%,...

Debin Sun, Zhangyong Li, Yu Lei et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

The dual role of biochar in modulating microplastic effects on soil nitrogen

Microplastics persist in the environment due to their resistance to degradation and pose an increasing concern for terrestrial ecosystems, threatening soil physicochemical properties and nitrogen (N) cycling. Biochar is widely used to improve soil quality and mitigate contamination. However little is known about how bi...

Yan-Yan Zhang, Khalid Hussain, Xiao-Yan Tang et al. · 0 citations

Effects of polyethylene microplastics and addition of nitrogen sources on bacterial communities in agricultural soil and biodegradation efficiency by isolated bacterial consortia

Polyethylene microplastics (PE MPs) are emerging pollutants in agricultural soil, and biodegradation is a potential solution where microbial enzymes attack the polymer chain to use it as a nutrient (the 1st pathway) with a recent study indicated nitric oxide to have a role in PE biodegradation via the pathway of nitrog...

Sovathana Phuong · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.