It is shown that fostering deep trust in AI, as now required by regulatory frameworks worldwide, will unlock its full potential and transform the pace of adoption across mission-critical domains.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is currently only applied to non-safety critical applications due to the strict standards and regulations for railway industries. We propose to review the three main fields necessary to increase trust in data science and AI algorithms and reach compliance: robustness, Operational Design Domain (ODD), and explainability. Robustness is the ability of an AI system to maintain its level of performance under any circumstances (ISO24029). ODDs allow the explicit definition of operating conditions under which a system is intended to operate, according to the recently published DIN DKE SPEC 99004. Explainability is the property of an AI system to express important factors influencing the AI system results in a way that humans can understand. Those 3 domains of research are already well investigated by nonrailway actors, with algorithms and methods ready to use for railway applications. A system view is necessary to ensure all trustworthy requirements interact continuously in a safe MLOps environment thereby fostering acceptance from regulators, operators and the public. Beyond safeguarding safety-critical applications, we aim to show that fostering deep trust in AI, as now required by regulatory frameworks worldwide, will unlock its full potential and transform the pace of adoption across mission-critical domains.
The research is devoted to the issue of creating a safe and reliable artificial intelligence (AI) system. Objective: to create a clear list of requirements for future standards in the field of ethics of artificial intelligence in order to bridge the gap between theory and practice. Methods: methods of induction and syn...
Anastasiya Fedorova, L. Kazanskaya· Bulletin of scientific resea...· 0 citations
This document presents an overview of the opportunities and concerns associated with AI deployment through a graphical representation of six application domains, depicted as the petals of a flower: anticipating risks; distancing operators from the most hazardous situations; protecting exposed operators; enhancing human...
It is necessary to ask ourselves whether, according to AI, it is appropriate to resort to common civil liability regimes or to refer to different special legislation; and also evaluate whether to invest AI with legal subjectivity and therefore the possibility that an automated system will be directly liable for the dam...
G. Marsico· European Journal of Privacy...· 0 citations
In the artificial intelligence (AI) era, the structure of safety hazards in university laboratories is changing, with unconventional hazards making up a growing share. As AI evolves from an auxiliary tool into an autonomous research collaborator, interdisciplinary experiments are becoming faster and more intense, produ...
This study assesses whether India needs a specific AI law by comparing the advantages of the EU's comprehensive legislative approach with India's current legal framework and offering suggestions for creating a fair, innovative and rights-protective AI regulatory framework that is in line with India's constitutional ide...
Nimisha Mishra, T. Rajesh· International Journal of Law...· 0 citations
With $2.1 million funding from Google.org, the open-source Public Transit Intelligence Hub will unify public transit monitoring, operations, and passenger communication.