May 2026· IEEE Internet of Things Journal· Vol 13, pp. 20452-20476· 6 citations· ⚡ 1 influential· 148 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This article comprehensively analyzes GPAI systems, focusing on their architectural foundations, current applications, and key limitations, and summarizes promising research directions in data-efficient learning, sim-to-real transfer, edge-compatible architectures, and safety frameworks.
Abstract
The integration of large-scale foundation models with physical embodiments has led to significant advancements in robotics termed generative physical artificial intelligence (GPAI). These agentic AI systems autonomously perceive, reason, and act in complex real-world situations. This article comprehensively analyzes GPAI systems, focusing on their architectural foundations, current applications, and key limitations. We introduce a taxonomy of five distinct approaches: robot foundation models (RFMs) for cross-platform skill transfer; vision–language–action (VLA) models for end-to-end multimodal perception and control; large behavior models (LBMs) for human-like movement generation; diffusion policy models (DPMs) for diffusion model-based temporally coherent action generation; and world foundation models (WFMs) for physics-compliant simulation and data generation. We examine how these approaches complement each other: WFMs generate training data for VLA models and DPMs, RFMs enable cross-platform deployment of learned policies, and LBMs provide motion priors for natural behavior. Through examples across autonomous vehicles, industrial automation, healthcare robotics, and humanoid systems, we identify significant performance improvements and summarize promising research directions in data-efficient learning, sim-to-real transfer, edge-compatible architectures, and safety frameworks. These insights advance embodied AI for the Internet of Things (IoT)-connected environments, where intelligent agents interact with networked sensors, actuators, and edge devices.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.
Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 316 citations· ⚡15
It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...
Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 302 citations· ⚡60